Re: [gentoo-amd64] mozilla-thunderbird vs. mozilla-thunderbird-bin

["Michael Weyershäuser" <thedude0001@gmx.de>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Conway S. Smith wrote:
> Hey list,
> 
> I'm thinking about switching from the Mozilla/Seamonkey suite to
> Thunderbird for my email client.  And in the Portage tree it's got both
> mozilla-thunderbird & mozilla-thunderbird-bin, similar to Firefox.  Now
> with Firefox there's all the 32-bit plugin issues, so most of us (of
> course not Duncan ;-) probably have & use both firefox & firefox-bin,
> but with Thunderbird, are there really any reasons we'd need a 32-bit
> version installed?  

I guess the only reason for mozilla-firefox-in is the one it was
originally started: it can take ages to compile these packages on a
low-end machine.

> Also, does anyone know if they could both be
> installed & play well w/ each other, the way firefox does?  I'd guess
> they would, but if not I'd rather know before-hand.

thunderbird and thunderbird-bin aren't blocking each other, so I'd
guess they won't get into each others way. rhunderbird-bin gets
installed to /opt, I don't see a problem in having them both installed.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEzAoH6q4f+IV6B/wRAotEAJ9yuq6y/hv+t58aVp1he4RR+niq4wCfRyuz
IRaMlKitTDYnid5j5AI89mA=
=AhJG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list