* [gentoo-amd64] OpenOffice
@ 2006-07-18 21:13 Daniele Salatti
2006-07-19 6:29 ` PaulNM
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Daniele Salatti @ 2006-07-18 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-amd64
Hi list!!
"emerge --search openoffice" show that openoffice is masked. Instead,
there is an unmasked package called openoffice-bin. Does it mean that
OOo doesn't compile on amd64?
TIA, Daniele
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-amd64] OpenOffice
2006-07-18 21:13 [gentoo-amd64] OpenOffice Daniele Salatti
@ 2006-07-19 6:29 ` PaulNM
2006-07-19 7:00 ` Daniele Salatti
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: PaulNM @ 2006-07-19 6:29 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-amd64
Daniele Salatti wrote:
> Hi list!!
> "emerge --search openoffice" show that openoffice is masked. Instead,
> there is an unmasked package called openoffice-bin. Does it mean that
> OOo doesn't compile on amd64?
> TIA, Daniele
>
Yes, in fact, if you do an "emerge -p openoffice" it will tell you it's
masked and has a message that says something like "Don't even think of
trying to compile openoffice, it won't work anyway."
PaulNM
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-amd64] OpenOffice
2006-07-19 6:29 ` PaulNM
@ 2006-07-19 7:00 ` Daniele Salatti
2006-07-19 7:19 ` PaulNM
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Daniele Salatti @ 2006-07-19 7:00 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-amd64
PaulNM wrote:
> Daniele Salatti wrote:
>
>> Hi list!!
>> "emerge --search openoffice" show that openoffice is masked. Instead,
>> there is an unmasked package called openoffice-bin. Does it mean that
>> OOo doesn't compile on amd64?
>> TIA, Daniele
>>
>>
>
> Yes, in fact, if you do an "emerge -p openoffice" it will tell you it's
> masked and has a message that says something like "Don't even think of
> trying to compile openoffice, it won't work anyway."
>
>
> PaulNM
Thank you!!
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-amd64] OpenOffice
2006-07-19 7:00 ` Daniele Salatti
@ 2006-07-19 7:19 ` PaulNM
2006-07-19 8:40 ` Jan Jitse Venselaar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: PaulNM @ 2006-07-19 7:19 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-amd64
Daniele Salatti wrote:
> PaulNM wrote:
>> Daniele Salatti wrote:
>>
>>> Hi list!!
>>> "emerge --search openoffice" show that openoffice is masked. Instead,
>>> there is an unmasked package called openoffice-bin. Does it mean that
>>> OOo doesn't compile on amd64?
>>> TIA, Daniele
>>>
>>>
>> Yes, in fact, if you do an "emerge -p openoffice" it will tell you it's
>> masked and has a message that says something like "Don't even think of
>> trying to compile openoffice, it won't work anyway."
>>
>>
>> PaulNM
> Thank you!!
>
For posterity, since my AMD64X2 was not on earlier:
Optimus ~ # emerge -p openoffice
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies
!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "openoffice" have been masked.
!!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your
request:
- app-office/openoffice-2.0.3 (masked by: package.mask, -amd64 keyword)
# 2005/10/24 Simon Stelling <blubb@gentoo.org>
# Don't even try to compile openoffice-2.x, it won't work.
For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page or
refer to the Gentoo Handbook.
PaulNM
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-amd64] OpenOffice
2006-07-19 7:19 ` PaulNM
@ 2006-07-19 8:40 ` Jan Jitse Venselaar
2006-07-19 10:45 ` [gentoo-amd64] OpenOffice Daniele Salatti
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jan Jitse Venselaar @ 2006-07-19 8:40 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-amd64
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1108 bytes --]
On Wednesday 19 July 2006 09:19, PaulNM wrote:
>
> For posterity, since my AMD64X2 was not on earlier:
>
>
> Optimus ~ # emerge -p openoffice
>
> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
>
> Calculating dependencies
> !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "openoffice" have been masked.
> !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your
> request:
> - app-office/openoffice-2.0.3 (masked by: package.mask, -amd64 keyword)
> # 2005/10/24 Simon Stelling <blubb@gentoo.org>
> # Don't even try to compile openoffice-2.x, it won't work.
>
>
> For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page or
> refer to the Gentoo Handbook.
>
>
>
> PaulNM
If you really want a 64-bit openoffice you can try geki's overlay (
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-195406.html ). Be warned though, you
will need Java 1.6 (available from the java-migration-packages overlay), a
lot of free disk space in /var/tmp/portage, a lot of patience and some luck.
Also, there are still some problems, it still crashes on me now and then.
Jan Jitse
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-amd64] Re: OpenOffice
2006-07-19 8:40 ` Jan Jitse Venselaar
@ 2006-07-19 10:45 ` Daniele Salatti
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Daniele Salatti @ 2006-07-19 10:45 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-amd64
Jan Jitse Venselaar wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 July 2006 09:19, PaulNM wrote:
>> For posterity, since my AMD64X2 was not on earlier:
>>
>>
>> Optimus ~ # emerge -p openoffice
>>
>> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
>>
>> Calculating dependencies
>> !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "openoffice" have been masked.
>> !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your
>> request:
>> - app-office/openoffice-2.0.3 (masked by: package.mask, -amd64 keyword)
>> # 2005/10/24 Simon Stelling <blubb@gentoo.org>
>> # Don't even try to compile openoffice-2.x, it won't work.
>>
>>
>> For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page or
>> refer to the Gentoo Handbook.
>>
>>
>>
>> PaulNM
> If you really want a 64-bit openoffice you can try geki's overlay (
> http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-195406.html ). Be warned though, you
> will need Java 1.6 (available from the java-migration-packages overlay), a
> lot of free disk space in /var/tmp/portage, a lot of patience and some luck.
> Also, there are still some problems, it still crashes on me now and then.
>
> Jan Jitse
Uhmm...I think I will use the 32bit binary version... ;-)
Thankyou any way!!
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-amd64] OpenOffice
@ 2006-07-19 18:00 Dmitri Pogosyan
2006-07-19 21:50 ` Daniele Salatti
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Dmitri Pogosyan @ 2006-07-19 18:00 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-amd64
In general, when you see masked package in 'emerge --search',
whether you can use it or not depends on how it is masked.
If it was ~amd64, meaning it is in testing stage, you could compile it and
probably be happy, but openoffice is -amd64, which means it does not work.
Unfortunately 'emerge --search' does not give this detailed information.
One way to check is to run
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS='~amd64' emerge --pretend openoffice and see if
this unmasks the package.
> Hi list!!
> "emerge --search openoffice" show that openoffice is masked. Instead,
> there is an unmasked package called openoffice-bin. Does it mean that
> OOo doesn't compile on amd64?
> TIA, Daniele
>
> --
> gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
--
Dmitri Pogosyan Department of Physics
Associate Professor University of Alberta
tel 1-780-492-2150 412 Avadh Bhatia Physics Labs
fax 1-780-492-0714 Edmonton, AB, T6G 2J1, CANADA
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-amd64] OpenOffice
2006-07-19 18:00 [gentoo-amd64] OpenOffice Dmitri Pogosyan
@ 2006-07-19 21:50 ` Daniele Salatti
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Daniele Salatti @ 2006-07-19 21:50 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-amd64
Dmitri Pogosyan wrote:
> In general, when you see masked package in 'emerge --search',
> whether you can use it or not depends on how it is masked.
> If it was ~amd64, meaning it is in testing stage, you could compile it and
> probably be happy, but openoffice is -amd64, which means it does not work.
> Unfortunately 'emerge --search' does not give this detailed information.
> One way to check is to run
>
> ACCEPT_KEYWORDS='~amd64' emerge --pretend openoffice and see if
> this unmasks the package.
>
>
>
>
>> Hi list!!
>> "emerge --search openoffice" show that openoffice is masked. Instead,
>> there is an unmasked package called openoffice-bin. Does it mean that
>> OOo doesn't compile on amd64?
>> TIA, Daniele
>>
>> --
>> gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Dmitri Pogosyan Department of Physics
> Associate Professor University of Alberta
> tel 1-780-492-2150 412 Avadh Bhatia Physics Labs
> fax 1-780-492-0714 Edmonton, AB, T6G 2J1, CANADA
>
Thank you!! I emerged openoffice-bin, and all is working fine...
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-07-19 21:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-07-18 21:13 [gentoo-amd64] OpenOffice Daniele Salatti
2006-07-19 6:29 ` PaulNM
2006-07-19 7:00 ` Daniele Salatti
2006-07-19 7:19 ` PaulNM
2006-07-19 8:40 ` Jan Jitse Venselaar
2006-07-19 10:45 ` [gentoo-amd64] OpenOffice Daniele Salatti
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-07-19 18:00 [gentoo-amd64] OpenOffice Dmitri Pogosyan
2006-07-19 21:50 ` Daniele Salatti
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox