From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EZNk6-0004gz-1d for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 07:18:06 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jA87GaAE008569; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 07:16:36 GMT Received: from pegasus.linuxengine.net (pegasus.linuxengine.net [69.93.23.154]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jA87GZsQ032187 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 07:16:36 GMT Received: from [192.168.45.60] (71.19.168.202.velocitynet.com.au [202.168.19.71]) (authenticated bits=0) by pegasus.linuxengine.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jA87GClq029559 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 01:16:16 -0600 Message-ID: <437050B6.7000208@internode.on.net> Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 18:16:06 +1100 From: Chris Smart User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051003) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] openoffice 2 compiles? References: <200511080636.jA86a5e10239@webmail.phys.ualberta.ca> In-Reply-To: <200511080636.jA86a5e10239@webmail.phys.ualberta.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87/1166/Mon Nov 7 13:01:45 2005 on pegasus.linuxengine.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: -4.5 () IN_REP_TO,SUBJ_ENDS_IN_Q_MARK X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 69.93.23.154 X-Archives-Salt: e077aead-ec34-4d3d-a3b6-74c680a27d87 X-Archives-Hash: 426c9f81d493d459a99e3de16f5ab5ee Dmitri Pogosyan wrote: >The claim is amd64 compilation is planned for 2.0.2 > > cheers, for some reason I thought you could compile it on an amd64 arch but not as an actual 64bit app (ie in 32bit mode using emul). -c -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list