* [gentoo-amd64] Problems with complieing with amd64
@ 2005-10-19 13:55 Nestor Camacho III
2005-10-19 15:13 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Nestor Camacho III @ 2005-10-19 13:55 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-amd64
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2882 bytes --]
I have one of those Sun Java workstations, and figured I would put
gentoo on it. While I was installing it I would sometimes get the
following symptoms.
It would just stop compiling. Would not freeze, I was able to do
anything else, but it would just stop processing what it was currently
compiling. When I alt f2 into another window and do a top, I would see
that the sh process was at 99%, and had been running for a long time. If
I do a kill -HUP, on the process things would continue... but I can't
imgaine that his is a fix for the problem.
Is there anyone out there that has had this problem?
The procs are 2 of the following with 2 gigs of ram.
processor : 0
vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
cpu family : 15
model : 37
model name : AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 252
stepping : 1
cpu MHz : 2592.666
cache size : 1024 KB
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 1
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge
mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt
lm 3dnowext 3dnow pni lahf_lm
bogomips : 5095.42
TLB size : 1024 4K pages
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management: ts fid vid ttp
top - 09:49:14 up 1 day, 23:07, 7 users, load average: 1.00, 1.16, 1.36
Tasks: 108 total, 2 running, 105 sleeping, 0 stopped, 1 zombie
Cpu(s): 15.7% us, 0.5% sy, 7.2% ni, 76.2% id, 0.1% wa, 0.0% hi, 0.2% si
Mem: 2056096k total, 1643992k used, 412104k free, 458632k buffers
Swap: 995988k total, 208k used, 995780k free, 441620k cached
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
*21166 root 25 0 4232 428 340 R 99.4 0.0 827:12.92 sh*
21278 jedi 16 0 188m 67m 12m S 2.0 3.3 0:11.35 python
1 root 16 0 2548 480 412 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.41 init
2 root RT 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.18 migration/0
3 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.02 ksoftirqd/0
4 root RT 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.22 migration/1
5 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.02 ksoftirqd/1
6 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 events/0
7 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.25 events/1
8 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 khelper
9 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kthread
14 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kacpid
103 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kblockd/0
104 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kblockd/1
107 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 khubd
175 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 pdflush
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5843 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-amd64] Re: Problems with complieing with amd64
2005-10-19 13:55 [gentoo-amd64] Problems with complieing with amd64 Nestor Camacho III
@ 2005-10-19 15:13 ` Duncan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Duncan @ 2005-10-19 15:13 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-amd64
Nestor Camacho III posted <43565060.5040604@nnc3.com>, excerpted below,
on Wed, 19 Oct 2005 09:55:44 -0400:
> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
> <html>
> <head>
> <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
> <title></title>
> </head>
> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
> I have one of those Sun Java workstations, and figured I would put
> gentoo on it. While I was installing it I would sometimes get the
> following symptoms. <br>
Unfortunately, I don't have an answer to your question, but... in the
future could you please refrain from posting HTML to the list? It's
common in the Linux and open source community to consider HTML mail the
playground of spammers and crackers, and as such, many either filter it
entirely, or at minimum use clients that don't parse it, for security
reasons. Thus, HTML posts come out looking like crap, if they are seen at
all, and folks that might otherwise have your answer never reply, either
because they didn't see the post in the first place, or because they
simply don't reply to those that post HTML.
On the Gentoo lists/groups, people aren't as strict and you'll often get a
reply, but it's still a good idea to turn off HTML once you are made aware
of the fact you are posting with it. After all, is your post /really/ so
lacking in content that it /must/ be dressed up all fancy in HTML to make
it interesting enough to read? If not, why waste the bandwidth and risk
offense, unnecessarily?
--
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in
http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-10-19 15:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-10-19 13:55 [gentoo-amd64] Problems with complieing with amd64 Nestor Camacho III
2005-10-19 15:13 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox