From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1ERTs8-0007fo-7R
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 12:13:44 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j9HCAJOo029966;
	Mon, 17 Oct 2005 12:10:19 GMT
Received: from windmuehlgasse.getdesigned.at (chello062178000135.1.11.univie.teleweb.at [62.178.0.135])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j9HCAHp5003823
	for <gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 12:10:18 GMT
Received: (qmail 12670 invoked from network); 17 Oct 2005 14:14:10 +0200
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.5?) (192.168.1.5)
  by 192.168.1.1 with SMTP; 17 Oct 2005 14:14:10 +0200
Message-ID: <43539567.9080803@getdesigned.at>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 14:13:27 +0200
From: Sebastian Redl <sebastian.redl@getdesigned.at>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20051014)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-amd64+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-amd64+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-amd64+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-amd64.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Merged Framebuffer
References: <5bdc1c8b0510151118p447b72a9la959017a0de1dd08@mail.gmail.com> <pan.2005.10.16.17.26.06.714742@cox.net> <5bdc1c8b0510161150r27a36415pf435d4f9ab6ea638@mail.gmail.com> <4352EDBE.7030503@gmx.net> <pan.2005.10.17.11.45.47.238909@cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <pan.2005.10.17.11.45.47.238909@cox.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: d27a2b6c-370b-4ff5-91d6-1f85595061e2
X-Archives-Hash: 7160a5b956d9be110d68ee10acd0c266

Duncan wrote:

>Oh...  Previously I was trying to run a separate "screen" config for each
>monitor, thus, two per card since each card has two outputs.  I'm now
>running xorg's merged framebuffer for Radeons, so it's actually possible
>the problem will have disappeared when I actually try it again...
>  
>
What exactly are the effects of this, and how do I do it? I have a 
Radeon 9800 Pro with two monitors, and right now they're rather 
disjointed. I'd like them to act as one, but I don't want maximized 
windows being spread over both screens.

Sebastian Redl
-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list