public inbox for gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gentoo-amd64] Dual core vs dual chip
@ 2005-08-12  5:24 Chris S
  2005-08-12 13:24 ` Matt Randolph
  2005-08-12 13:47 ` Peter Schneider-Kamp
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Chris S @ 2005-08-12  5:24 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-amd64

Greetings,

I am curious. Would people recommend a single Athlon X2 compared to Dual 
Opteron at same specs?

ie:

2 x 248 Opterons (2.2GHz, 1Mb, HT1600) in Tyan Thunder K8SRE (nForce 4 
Pro 2200) or
1 x 4400+ Athlon X2 (Dualcore 2.2Ghz, 1Mb, HT2000) in Tyan Tomcat K8E 
(nForce 4)
1 x 175 Opteron (Dualcore 2.2GHz, 1Mb, HT1600) in a single socket 940 
pin mainboard

How would they fair as a server?

Cheers,
Chris
-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-amd64] Dual core vs dual chip
  2005-08-12  5:24 [gentoo-amd64] Dual core vs dual chip Chris S
@ 2005-08-12 13:24 ` Matt Randolph
  2005-08-12 13:47 ` Peter Schneider-Kamp
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Matt Randolph @ 2005-08-12 13:24 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-amd64

Chris S wrote:

> Greetings,
>
> I am curious. Would people recommend a single Athlon X2 compared to 
> Dual Opteron at same specs?
>
> ie:
>
> 2 x 248 Opterons (2.2GHz, 1Mb, HT1600) in Tyan Thunder K8SRE (nForce 4 
> Pro 2200) or
> 1 x 4400+ Athlon X2 (Dualcore 2.2Ghz, 1Mb, HT2000) in Tyan Tomcat K8E 
> (nForce 4)
> 1 x 175 Opteron (Dualcore 2.2GHz, 1Mb, HT1600) in a single socket 940 
> pin mainboard
>
> How would they fair as a server?
>
> Cheers,
> Chris


This sounds like a question to post at alt.comp.hardware.amd.x86-64 or 
similar since it hasn't anything to do with Gentoo. 

That being said, I have a feeling the dual processor machine would blow 
the dual core machines away for heavily multithreaded apps, though the 
Athlon 64 X2 might inch past the others when there was only a single 
thread, but that's only a guess.  It sounds like something to ask Tom's 
Hardware to look into, if they haven't already.  The dual Opteron would 
undoubtedly be the better server.  For one thing, a dual Opteron board 
may well support several times as much RAM as the other boards would.  
The solitary dual core Opteron would be the next best server, followed 
by the Athlon X2.  They should all make better servers than a single 
core/processor x86 machine would.  Generally speaking, these chips are 
priced the way they are for a reason.

-- 
"Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate" - W. of O.

-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-amd64] Dual core vs dual chip
  2005-08-12  5:24 [gentoo-amd64] Dual core vs dual chip Chris S
  2005-08-12 13:24 ` Matt Randolph
@ 2005-08-12 13:47 ` Peter Schneider-Kamp
  2005-08-12 23:36   ` Chris S
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Peter Schneider-Kamp @ 2005-08-12 13:47 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-amd64; +Cc: taskara

Chris S wrote:
> Greetings,
> 
> I am curious. Would people recommend a single Athlon X2 compared to Dual 
> Opteron at same specs?

I think you need to read the following article at anandtech:

http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2397

Kind regards,
Peter
-- 
Peter Schneider-Kamp   mailto:psk@informatik.rwth-aachen.de
LuFG Informatik II     http://www-i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/~nowonder
RWTH Aachen            phone: ++49 241 80-21211

-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-amd64] Dual core vs dual chip
  2005-08-12 13:47 ` Peter Schneider-Kamp
@ 2005-08-12 23:36   ` Chris S
  2005-08-13 19:53     ` Dice R. Random
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Chris S @ 2005-08-12 23:36 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-amd64

Peter Schneider-Kamp wrote:

>
> I think you need to read the following article at anandtech:
>
> http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2397
>
>
thanks guys.
-c
-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-amd64] Dual core vs dual chip
  2005-08-12 23:36   ` Chris S
@ 2005-08-13 19:53     ` Dice R. Random
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Dice R. Random @ 2005-08-13 19:53 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-amd64

On 8/12/05, Chris S <taskara@internode.on.net> wrote:
> Peter Schneider-Kamp wrote:
> 
> >
> > I think you need to read the following article at anandtech:
> >
> > http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2397
> >
> >
> thanks guys.
> -c
> --
> gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
> 
>

-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-08-13 19:55 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-08-12  5:24 [gentoo-amd64] Dual core vs dual chip Chris S
2005-08-12 13:24 ` Matt Randolph
2005-08-12 13:47 ` Peter Schneider-Kamp
2005-08-12 23:36   ` Chris S
2005-08-13 19:53     ` Dice R. Random

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox