From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1E30RJ-0003HF-3i
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 23:56:53 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j7ANroL7016868;
	Wed, 10 Aug 2005 23:53:50 GMT
Received: from buggy.blubb.ch (range21-65.shlink.ch [217.148.7.65])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7ANroRN011172
	for <gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 23:53:50 GMT
Received: from aqua ([192.168.10.5])
	by buggy.blubb.ch with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1E30Oh-0006sW-Uj
	for gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 01:54:11 +0200
Message-ID: <42FA93BD.9040807@gentoo.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 01:54:37 +0200
From: Simon Stelling <blubb@gentoo.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050716)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-amd64+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-amd64+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-amd64+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-amd64.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] 2005.1
References: <1123716976.13613.4.camel@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <1123716976.13613.4.camel@localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 7f2027a5-35e7-4767-9b11-21fb99cbf1d6
X-Archives-Hash: 98036d1ccceae958cb8c6fd7fd9a6c8a

Gregory Symons wrote:
> So, I was just wondering, does 2005.1 offer us any benefits?

Yeah, you get 0.1 more ;)
-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list