From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E2I4o-0006pa-Li for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2005 00:34:43 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j790X0Sj010502; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 00:33:00 GMT Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net (rwcrmhc13.comcast.net [216.148.227.118]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j790WwKJ001813 for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 00:32:59 GMT Received: from [192.168.0.123] (pcp04370732pcs.nrockv01.md.comcast.net[69.140.218.245]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with ESMTP id <20050809003321015006secje>; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 00:33:22 +0000 Message-ID: <42F7F9D0.9030406@erols.com> Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 20:33:20 -0400 From: Matt Randolph User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050723) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Re: file type not allowed in /usr/lib References: <42F53B6D.1080908@burnieanglican.org.au> <42F66B78.1030708@gentoo.org> <42F7B071.7060603@gentoo.org> <42F7E516.2030103@erols.com> In-Reply-To: <42F7E516.2030103@erols.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 5547e5c2-9e0c-4cc1-805d-a8478752eee8 X-Archives-Hash: c9edbd2a4eadb14e4b6bef479edb669d Matt Randolph wrote: > Simon Stelling wrote: > >> >> First, I didn't really want to offend you, although I have to admit >> that a few statements were rather harsh. I didn't feel offended, and >> I know you didn't want to say my answer was incompetent. However, if >> I *were* the questioner, I'd feel offended, since I don't need >> everything explained twice, and if I don't get it, I ask further >> questions. Generally explaining it a second time somehow implies that >> I didn't get it the first time, but perhaps that's just me. > > Simon Stelling wrote: > > Just a personal note on this: What's the point in repeating > everything? You only bore people with it. I think we can assume that > the original poster either gets it the first time, or he'll surely ask > again and give details about what he didn't understand. > Oops! I meant to quote you when you said it the first time. -- "Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate" - W. of O. -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list