public inbox for gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Strandman <simon.strandman@telia.com>
To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64]  Re: x86_64 optimization patches for glibc.
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 21:21:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42ED24BB.8030103@telia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pan.2005.07.31.14.24.54.979639@cox.net>

Duncan skrev:

>Simon Strandman posted <42E55ADB.8030201@telia.com>, excerpted below,  on
>Mon, 25 Jul 2005 23:34:19 +0200:
>
>  
>
>>Done! Bug #100289
>>http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100289
>>
>>Tell me if I need to provide any more information.
>>    
>>
>
>For those following the thread here, but not keeping up with the bug,
>testing reveals that at least one app, nano, crashes (when searching),
>with the patches applied to glibc, until nano is remerged against the new
>glibc. Yes, that means that the issue goes away with a remerge, but there
>could be other apps similarly affected.
>  
>

But changes to glibc usually breaks stuff and requires recompiling. 
Remember what happened when glibc 2.3.4.20041102 was marked stable? A 
lot of people got crashes and problems and needed to recompile or even 
reinstall. The switch to NPTL only in glibc 2.4 will cause this kind of 
problems too. So perhaps these patches could be added to the glibc 2.4 
snapshots (2.3.5.20050421 and 2.3.5.20050722) and 2.4 when it's released 
(if they are still relevant by then) because people will have to 
recompile then anyway. But a USE-flag is a good idea if they are added 
to a stable version!

-- 
Simon Strandman <simon.strandman@telia.com>

-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-07-31 19:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-07-23 14:48 [gentoo-amd64] x86_64 optimization patches for glibc Simon Strandman
2005-07-23 16:36 ` Allan Wang
2005-07-23 17:08   ` Simon Strandman
2005-07-23 17:30     ` Allan Wang
2005-07-23 18:11       ` Jared Lindsay
2005-07-23 18:19         ` Allan Wang
2005-07-27 10:09     ` netpython
2005-07-27 16:11       ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2005-07-23 18:44   ` [gentoo-amd64] " Brian Litzinger
2005-07-25 22:24     ` Luke-Jr
2005-07-25 22:38       ` Olivier Crete
2005-07-26 15:40         ` Luke-Jr
2005-07-26 16:50           ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2005-07-26 17:02             ` Raffaele BELARDI
2005-07-26 17:49               ` Michael Edwards
2005-07-26 18:42                 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2005-07-27  0:05             ` [gentoo-amd64] " Sami Samhuri
2005-07-27  2:50             ` Matt Randolph
2005-07-26  2:54       ` [gentoo-amd64] " Brian Litzinger
2005-07-23 16:39 ` Sean Johnson
2005-07-23 22:15 ` Matt Randolph
2005-07-23 22:36   ` Matt Randolph
2005-07-24  1:47     ` Sean Johnson
2005-07-24  3:36       ` Matt Randolph
2005-07-24  5:36         ` Ian McCulloch
2005-07-24  7:42           ` Jared Lindsay
2005-07-24 14:35             ` Simon Strandman
2005-07-24 18:13               ` Jared Lindsay
2005-07-25 20:08 ` Jeremy Huddleston
2005-07-25 21:34   ` Simon Strandman
2005-07-25 22:00     ` Jared Lindsay
2005-07-31 14:24     ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2005-07-31 14:56       ` Brian Hall
2005-07-31 16:23         ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2005-07-31 17:42           ` Ben Skeggs
2005-07-31 18:46             ` Jared Lindsay
2005-07-31 18:52               ` Nuitari
2005-08-01 13:51             ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2005-07-31 19:21       ` Simon Strandman [this message]
2005-08-01  9:04       ` [gentoo-amd64] " Jan Jitse Venselaar
2005-08-01 13:45         ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2005-08-01 17:03           ` Karol Krizka
2005-08-02 10:21             ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2005-08-02 19:41               ` Matt Randolph
2005-08-02 23:27                 ` [gentoo-amd64] hijacked! :) television (was: x86_64 optimization patches for glibc.) Sami Samhuri
2005-08-04  2:28                   ` Luke-Jr
2005-08-05  0:28                     ` Sami Samhuri
2005-08-05  7:43                       ` Arm Suwarnaratana
2005-08-09 10:29         ` [gentoo-amd64] Re: x86_64 optimization patches for glibc Simon Strandman
2005-07-26 17:40 ` [gentoo-amd64] " ardour

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=42ED24BB.8030103@telia.com \
    --to=simon.strandman@telia.com \
    --cc=gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox