From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DxAcv-0001X1-7B for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 21:36:45 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j6PLYQuJ016844; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 21:34:26 GMT Received: from pne-smtpout1-sn2.hy.skanova.net (pne-smtpout1-sn2.hy.skanova.net [81.228.8.83]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6PLYPx1008599 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 21:34:25 GMT Received: from [192.168.0.236] (81.226.250.213) by pne-smtpout1-sn2.hy.skanova.net (7.2.060.1) (authenticated as u18221075) id 42BFBBD200485A61; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 23:34:25 +0200 Message-ID: <42E55ADB.8030201@telia.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 23:34:19 +0200 From: Simon Strandman User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: sv, en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeremy Huddleston CC: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] x86_64 optimization patches for glibc. References: <42E258A7.5080501@telia.com> <1122322081.12747.5.camel@cloud.outersquare.org> In-Reply-To: <1122322081.12747.5.camel@cloud.outersquare.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 41b09d04-d0c6-4d63-8054-0fc35d966c3a X-Archives-Hash: 891b1dc6b6c2becbac9930194dbd1857 Done! Bug #100289 http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100289 Tell me if I need to provide any more information. Jeremy Huddleston skrev: >Hey, I just finished reading through this thread. I'm not as good >keeping up on the lists as I should be. > >BUT... This sounds promising. Unfortunately you send the email just >after I unmasked 2.3.5-r1, so it's not going to get in there, but it >could get into the next release with further testing. Can you post both >patches to the bug, and I'll try to take care of getting the libm patch >to apply if nobody beats me to it. Also be sure to report back the bug >number, so folks here can follow it too. > >Thanks, >Jeremy > > > -- Simon Strandman -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list