From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DrB2S-0000Yp-AT for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2005 08:50:20 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j698mjx6003734; Sat, 9 Jul 2005 08:48:45 GMT Received: from smtp.nildram.co.uk (smtp.nildram.co.uk [195.112.4.54]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j698miW4001868 for ; Sat, 9 Jul 2005 08:48:44 GMT Received: from gaia.prhnet (unknown [84.12.164.30]) by smtp.nildram.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94DB9252EF8 for ; Sat, 9 Jul 2005 09:49:00 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.129.25] (wstn.home [192.168.129.25]) by gaia.prhnet (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3239B122B8 for ; Sat, 9 Jul 2005 09:49:03 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <42CF8F7D.1080306@gotadsl.co.uk> Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2005 09:49:01 +0100 From: Peter Humphrey User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050704) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Incipient hardware failure? References: <42CA5774.9060907@gotadsl.co.uk> <1120624277.23834.3.camel@athlon> <42CB993E.1090402@gotadsl.co.uk> <42CEA2DC.70205@gotadsl.co.uk> <42CF8A71.5090307@gotadsl.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <42CF8A71.5090307@gotadsl.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: c10a773a-f96c-40ad-be4f-068b156146fd X-Archives-Hash: 42d1b0f40f76b4d9274082c71b74a490 Peter Humphrey wrote: >I think I don't need to get swapping as I've got >two instances of the script operating in competition, one on each >physical disk. What with the BOINC clients, some routine emerging and >ordinary X user activity, if this doesn't break the system I don't know >what will! > > I should have added that my disks are showing 39 and 49 C in gkrellm. Hda is being used for reading at present, while the 20 copies of the code are being compared in parallel, whereas hdb is writing 20 copies in parallel. 49 C makes me nervous :-( -- Rgds Peter Humphrey Linux Counter 5290, Aug 93. -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list