public inbox for gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: netpython <phaceton@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] x86_64 optimization patches for glibc.
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:09:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3655f5d905072703096be71ed1@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42E27993.5080802@telia.com>

Should i use -march=k8 or -march=athlon64 ? Or doesn't make any
difference? My CPU is a AMD64 3000+



On 7/23/05, Simon Strandman <simon.strandman@telia.com> wrote:
> Allan Wang skrev:
> 
> >
> >Hmm, I don't see much difference here.
> >
> >before:
> >allan@aw ~ $ ./a.out 2420 1000 1048576
> >Memory to memory copy rate = 1110.198486 MBytes / sec. Block size =
> >1048576.
> >
> >after:
> >aw allan # ./a.out 2420 1000 1048576
> >Memory to memory copy rate = 1154.922974 MBytes / sec. Block size =
> >1048576.
> >
> >Allan
> >
> >
> >
> What kind och system do you have?
> 
> These are my spec:
> AMD64 3500+ Winchester 2,2ghz
> Asus A8N-SLI Deluxe (nforce4)
> 1024mb DDR dual channel
> 
> And emerge info:
> isidor ~ # emerge info
> Portage 2.0.51.22-r2 (default-linux/amd64/2005.0, gcc-3.4.4,
> glibc-2.3.5-r0, 2.6.12-ck3-r1 x86_64)
> =================================================================
> System uname: 2.6.12-ck3-r1 x86_64 AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3500+
> Gentoo Base System version 1.6.13
> dev-lang/python:     2.3.5
> sys-apps/sandbox:    1.2.11
> sys-devel/autoconf:  2.13, 2.59-r6
> sys-devel/automake:  1.4_p6, 1.5, 1.6.3, 1.7.9-r1, 1.8.5-r3, 1.9.5
> sys-devel/binutils:  2.16.1, 2.16.91.0.1
> sys-devel/libtool:   1.5.18-r1
> virtual/os-headers:  2.6.11-r2
> ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="amd64"
> AUTOCLEAN="yes"
> CBUILD="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu"
> CFLAGS="-O2 -march=athlon64 -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -fno-ident"
> CHOST="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu"
> CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/kde/2/share/config /usr/kde/3/share/config
> /usr/lib/X11/xkb /usr/share/config /var/qmail/control"
> CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/gconf /etc/terminfo /etc/env.d"
> CXXFLAGS="-O2 -march=athlon64 -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -fno-ident
> -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -fno-enforce-eh-specs"
> DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles"
> FEATURES="autoconfig distlocks sandbox sfperms strict"
> GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://snigel.no-ip.com/ http://mirror.pudas.net/gentoo
> ftp://ftp.rhnet.is/pub/gentoo/
> ftp://linux.rz.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/gentoo-mirror/
> http://ftp.rhnet.is/pub/gentoo/"
> LANG="sv_SE.UTF-8"
> LC_ALL="sv_SE.UTF-8"
> LDFLAGS="-Wl,-O1"
> LINGUAS="sv"
> MAKEOPTS="-j2"
> PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages"
> PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp"
> PORTDIR="/usr/portage"
> PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/local/portage"
> SYNC="rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage"
> USE="amd64 X aalib alsa artswrappersuid avi berkdb caps cdr crypt dga
> dlloader dvd dvdr dvdread encode f77 fbcon foomaticdb fortran gcj gif
> glibc-omitfp gnome gphoto2 gpm gtk gtk2 hal imlib ipv6 ithreads
> jack-tmpfs java javascript jpeg kdeenablefinal logitech-mouse lzw
> lzw-tiff mad mikmod mng mozilla mp3 mpeg ncurses nls nomalloccheck nptl
> nptlonly nvidia objc offensive oggvorbis opengl pdflib perl pic png pnp
> python qt quicktime readline samba sdl spell ssl svg tcpd threadstiff
> truetype truetype-fonts type1-fonts unicode usb userlocales
> visualization xine xml2 xmms xpm xv xvid zlib video_cards_nvidia
> linguas_sv userland_GNU kernel_linux elibc_glibc"
> Unset:  ASFLAGS, CTARGET
> 
> --
> Simon Strandman <simon.strandman@telia.com>
> 
> --
> gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
> 
>

-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-07-27 10:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-07-23 14:48 [gentoo-amd64] x86_64 optimization patches for glibc Simon Strandman
2005-07-23 16:36 ` Allan Wang
2005-07-23 17:08   ` Simon Strandman
2005-07-23 17:30     ` Allan Wang
2005-07-23 18:11       ` Jared Lindsay
2005-07-23 18:19         ` Allan Wang
2005-07-27 10:09     ` netpython [this message]
2005-07-27 16:11       ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2005-07-23 18:44   ` [gentoo-amd64] " Brian Litzinger
2005-07-25 22:24     ` Luke-Jr
2005-07-25 22:38       ` Olivier Crete
2005-07-26 15:40         ` Luke-Jr
2005-07-26 16:50           ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2005-07-26 17:02             ` Raffaele BELARDI
2005-07-26 17:49               ` Michael Edwards
2005-07-26 18:42                 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2005-07-27  0:05             ` [gentoo-amd64] " Sami Samhuri
2005-07-27  2:50             ` Matt Randolph
2005-07-26  2:54       ` [gentoo-amd64] " Brian Litzinger
2005-07-23 16:39 ` Sean Johnson
2005-07-23 22:15 ` Matt Randolph
2005-07-23 22:36   ` Matt Randolph
2005-07-24  1:47     ` Sean Johnson
2005-07-24  3:36       ` Matt Randolph
2005-07-24  5:36         ` Ian McCulloch
2005-07-24  7:42           ` Jared Lindsay
2005-07-24 14:35             ` Simon Strandman
2005-07-24 18:13               ` Jared Lindsay
2005-07-25 20:08 ` Jeremy Huddleston
2005-07-25 21:34   ` Simon Strandman
2005-07-25 22:00     ` Jared Lindsay
2005-07-31 14:24     ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2005-07-31 14:56       ` Brian Hall
2005-07-31 16:23         ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2005-07-31 17:42           ` Ben Skeggs
2005-07-31 18:46             ` Jared Lindsay
2005-07-31 18:52               ` Nuitari
2005-08-01 13:51             ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2005-07-31 19:21       ` [gentoo-amd64] " Simon Strandman
2005-08-01  9:04       ` Jan Jitse Venselaar
2005-08-01 13:45         ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2005-08-01 17:03           ` Karol Krizka
2005-08-02 10:21             ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2005-08-02 19:41               ` Matt Randolph
2005-08-02 23:27                 ` [gentoo-amd64] hijacked! :) television (was: x86_64 optimization patches for glibc.) Sami Samhuri
2005-08-04  2:28                   ` Luke-Jr
2005-08-05  0:28                     ` Sami Samhuri
2005-08-05  7:43                       ` Arm Suwarnaratana
2005-08-09 10:29         ` [gentoo-amd64] Re: x86_64 optimization patches for glibc Simon Strandman
2005-07-26 17:40 ` [gentoo-amd64] " ardour

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3655f5d905072703096be71ed1@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=phaceton@gmail.com \
    --cc=gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox