public inbox for gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frank Peters <frank.peters@comcast.net>
To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Did devs change phonon flags without rev'ing package?
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 03:32:30 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150331033230.549b2c680b917c5ca77944f0@comcast.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pan$e4ce5$d6972639$5327ebb4$39606c3f@cox.net>

On Tue, 31 Mar 2015 05:02:17 +0000 (UTC)
Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> wrote:

> 
> As I said, freedomware only, 64-bit-only is almost certainly easiest.  
> If, however, you're running servantware binaries of any sort, well, the 
> signature quote says it, you're effectively a slave to whatever whims the 
> master of that binary may have, and if they've never come out with 64-bit 
> or if you've never chosen to do whatever upgrade at whatever cost might 
> be required to get it, well...
> 

I am still very surprised that the mighty Intel Corporation has
not yet released a pure 64-bit ICC compiler for Linux -- and this
has been true for many, many years.  It would be interesting to try
out compiling some things with icc and the associated math performance
libraries, but the gentoo emerge always chokes with same "multilib
required" message whenever I try to build icc.

One possible workaround for those who may require the rare 32-bit
package at rare times would be to use the Gentoo LiveDVD which is
multilib in nature.  I am considering booting with LiveDVD whenever
I need to use a single 32-bit image processing program (which by the
way I have not been successful in converting to 64-bit even though
I have the full source code).  The Gentoo LiveDVD is nice bacause
it allows changes to persist.  One can incorporate custom configurations
and programs and expect to see them after the next boot.  The builders
of Gentoo LiveDVD did a great job with the latest release.

Frank Peter



  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-31  7:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-30 19:15 [gentoo-amd64] Did devs change phonon flags without rev'ing package? Mark Knecht
2015-03-30 19:48 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2015-03-30 21:04 ` Frank Peters
2015-03-30 21:26   ` Mark Knecht
2015-03-30 22:10     ` Barry Schwartz
2015-03-30 22:23       ` Mark Knecht
2015-03-30 23:06         ` Barry Schwartz
2015-03-31  5:02   ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2015-03-31  7:32     ` Frank Peters [this message]
2015-03-31 16:40     ` Barry Schwartz
2015-03-31 19:43       ` David M. Fellows
2015-04-01  0:28         ` Duncan
2015-04-01  0:47           ` I can run 32-bit stuff and you can't (was Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Did devs change phonon flags without rev'ing package?) Barry Schwartz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150331033230.549b2c680b917c5ca77944f0@comcast.net \
    --to=frank.peters@comcast.net \
    --cc=gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox