From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A116213838B for ; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 05:28:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E6EE8E0ABD; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 05:28:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from resqmta-po-03v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-po-03v.sys.comcast.net [96.114.154.162]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3ADF2E0A8A for ; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 05:28:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from resomta-po-19v.sys.comcast.net ([96.114.154.243]) by resqmta-po-03v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id uVUg1o0025FMDhs01VUgTG; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 05:28:40 +0000 Received: from crud.chemoelectric.org ([66.41.30.59]) by resomta-po-19v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id uVUf1o0041GXozm01VUfal; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 05:28:40 +0000 Received: by crud.chemoelectric.org (Postfix, from userid 1501) id DB261146021E; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 00:28:38 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 00:28:38 -0500 From: Barry Schwartz To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Boycott Systemd Message-ID: <20140923052838.GA1666@crud> References: <20140921192043.GA9652@crud> <20140921171301.5f008b3bd12c21c2f8fdd67e@comcast.net> <20140921202600.08d082d88014228172007477@comcast.net> <20140922175846.GA22399@crud> <5420EE55.1000301@nagafix.co.uk> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1411450120; bh=X2LtlCdN2KftIgEVOOQJzIghiT4wb/d2TqCWFjasX9E=; h=Received:Received:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=wYM0U/OS2VQ8Roa+v2ONCc3h8kBqH4HCmwQFcyEwz32nN3p7Lnk1rcTT4QAm1uzQS Im6X8kTVUmxa51x93Ie8uGDPlXhhEj9A7DTjc0nToirrO6vBPafcSS7XBS1gnU0vrX ya2PYikuO6AM4JfD1881pBfYD10Am5HDHYiiamOqIikn6EjQdVcxI8lL4fHkeyoVmM lbG0gVUiXIQrfRFWjmgcL3K9NeYoGo7utcftlkBQqGPIHNLGJyJBSCPmZmFXn5Vbqf mLy2cE7rnQ0zv/cNdBV7IKq2isgvupoX51y4TmlA9mMN+7kps0cGCx2dmSbt/zeE1w RRIEzFcUpFC0w== X-Archives-Salt: a4035bcf-cb45-42e9-80bd-4fd3d33daa05 X-Archives-Hash: 390f004bdf36f23f56bb832659d7e03b Canek Peláez Valdés skribis: > Finally, I know you didn't specifically said it was me, but I want to > make something clear: I've *never* in this thread said that anyone was > stupid or "holding back" progress. I said that the anonymous author > from boycottsystemd.org was either spreading FUD or ignorant, but I > presented proof of why it's blatantly false that GNOME has a hard > dependency on systemd. Here are the links again: [1], [2]. I verified the inaccuracy when you first mentioned it. The ebuilds, at least in the cases I examined, can use consolekit. I would not rush to use that website as a citation.