From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C86F13838B for ; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 04:32:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0500AE0AAC; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 04:32:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from qmta01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.16]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7FD3E0AAC for ; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 04:32:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.27]) by qmta01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id uUWS1o0010bG4ec51UY8kG; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 04:32:08 +0000 Received: from crud.chemoelectric.org ([66.41.30.59]) by omta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id uUY71o00E1GXozm3PUY7qw; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 04:32:08 +0000 Received: by crud.chemoelectric.org (Postfix, from userid 1501) id 212BA146021E; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 23:32:07 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 23:32:07 -0500 From: Barry Schwartz To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Boycott Systemd Message-ID: <20140923043207.GA31187@crud> References: <20140921192043.GA9652@crud> <20140921171301.5f008b3bd12c21c2f8fdd67e@comcast.net> <20140921202600.08d082d88014228172007477@comcast.net> <20140922175846.GA22399@crud> <5420EE55.1000301@nagafix.co.uk> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1411446728; bh=wBgRXqXrGvAgf1nr+ewfgLfgAA6JK/n8Ump75ZrL3Vw=; h=Received:Received:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=wdOd82KTBrkgfcNpOOqDSyUaryO0cqhpbv5+mUmzZXlUegeDY62yMEBNlaE+uOt/q /vL1rGo3UFTlJ1gOngvoIsv1ByyoqtvoU2PPJdDDwm/erSB9bLoVCmAiceKdwh6T5s L6m0H6yXAjzqQCQqRr4EES+VSzL5aypxIC8/1Z9CFB+zNRl7VTDlqlgNg+A8VGGbJa JjcQPJs2RjM2o252zxyEYz2HnNC51VUsAuKkSorQPP/wo5e4/4ePHzbknyu93GqRLd /yTT1v0275xD66e4iBqOtPo1pxs7qIbyBXy3OUzBHql5Fb0f7QQdAYfwgjb4oqB3VP OfTil3Vkgba6g== X-Archives-Salt: ac8c362f-3b8f-4f89-92e0-a4d55a2ac547 X-Archives-Hash: ff91f255644b368b19ac1d233cdb7cbe Canek Peláez Valdés skribis: > On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 10:51 PM, Antoine Martin wrote: > > Your attempt to dismiss other people's concern with an appeal to authority > > is cute. > > Thank you, I think so too. ... > I care about technical arguments (which this thread has been > *incredibly* lacking, except for the failed attempts to call a > "philosophy" a technical argument), and the opinion of experts on the > subject. ... > Canek Peláez Valdés > Profesor de asignatura, Facultad de Ciencias > Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Am I to understand that you are an actual academic and yet consider this kind of speech a reasonable discussion of technical issues? It is more like an exchange between political candidates or lawyers in a courtroom. This is why I don’t even bother to explain how fontconfig is ruining everything, even though I can do so in exquisite detail.