From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-amd64+bounces-13693-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E72BA13838B
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 19:54:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 03853E0B08;
	Mon, 22 Sep 2014 19:54:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from resqmta-po-05v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-po-05v.sys.comcast.net [96.114.154.164])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 589DAE0AD6
	for <gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 19:54:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from resomta-po-06v.sys.comcast.net ([96.114.154.230])
	by resqmta-po-05v.sys.comcast.net with comcast
	id uKuQ1o0034yXVJQ01KuaVy; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 19:54:34 +0000
Received: from crud.chemoelectric.org ([66.41.30.59])
	by resomta-po-06v.sys.comcast.net with comcast
	id uKuE1o00J1GXozm01KuQ5V; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 19:54:33 +0000
Received: by crud.chemoelectric.org (Postfix, from userid 1501)
	id 3BED3146021E; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 14:54:14 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 14:54:14 -0500
From: Barry Schwartz <chemoelectric@chemoelectric.org>
To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Boycott Systemd
Message-ID: <20140922195414.GA30185@crud>
References: <20140921143059.c3c16dfdeab6f65280b7caa6@comcast.net>
 <20140921192043.GA9652@crud>
 <CADPrc8020+LCqFJ6rV+_BJMVyrYx4BVp=Dog=9_1cUcqTqvoEQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20140921171301.5f008b3bd12c21c2f8fdd67e@comcast.net>
 <CADPrc82P+vY8gOvmMY9fHz9k6Tk8r1AOA-+oVTRCbTHyeXTFUw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20140921202600.08d082d88014228172007477@comcast.net>
 <CAGf7mVVqnqD2XAEmjC-svwYO8AVWSF-5B3i2h6b+4UgbyVSdJA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20140922175846.GA22399@crud>
 <CADPrc83+PJc_zfZ7csFOHu=HyCQ=PXR7TKp+SP__RejN1rdyTw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20140922153022.b0f67e1f35974448d986205b@comcast.net>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-amd64+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-amd64+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-amd64+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-amd64.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20140922153022.b0f67e1f35974448d986205b@comcast.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net;
	s=q20140121; t=1411415674;
	bh=k9F+7QYP3FaeUAuUBw4j6/zJE6CA8A4PIKWUh5Ta/qQ=;
	h=Received:Received:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:
	 MIME-Version:Content-Type;
	b=W/AxUWSOhyKhW8tWX5x8wrCe3QnME/CEisetENaVeAptP1PDuoMga2dJciQX+rVrc
	 eUhQrXX+yxbsCCviKYdeuKLm1HQIa1x6HDTKurk9lAcAhIIK5PpfsGGpXq3m0ZFNX6
	 k7nPP83bVxJSCoBS9+phYRnru3NQW9UuwxYcTz4bSDSEN2esW2Sk7DSPFvc+Mf3azH
	 Nwq63OGqSIFxN//Hq5ux2cPF7b9EfqgCS8JtSCqWC0HY2eO5wwyfJkhZJzanimhhKH
	 mel+s2gvxKtbk3QZoKfuw43FkCX/gt62I6GyPHZof8fP3jfI9ymjexXTkn0OYtCi2X
	 Ar1ZofZTOV6Iw==
X-Archives-Salt: c57320c0-44f1-49d8-821d-436ae517e90f
X-Archives-Hash: ec80c584687046ce8ca03b58a645980f

Frank Peters <frank.peters@comcast.net> skribis:
> Regarding the booting and configuring of a Linux system, the job can be
> either very complex or very simple.  For the simple case, is there
> technical merit in having to use systemd?  I would claim that there
> is not.  For complex scenarios, by all means utilize systemd.
> But let's keep the appropriate tools available for the appropriate job.

Yeah, I think people may not be getting my point. For instance, my
complaint is not that systemd exists, but, for instance, that someone
thought it a good idea to integrate udev and systemd, rather than make
the effort to keep them distinct.