From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2596D13877A for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 18:47:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3ED2EE0BF4; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 18:47:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from qmta15.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta15.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.59.228]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C6A3E0BC2 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 18:47:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.36]) by qmta15.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id FW3F1o0050mv7h05FWnMgP; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 18:47:21 +0000 Received: from ajax ([24.11.47.14]) by omta11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id FWnL1o00D0JMh7c3XWnLJg; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 18:47:20 +0000 Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 14:47:11 -0400 From: Frank Peters To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Disable SPP On GCC-4.8.3 Message-Id: <20140617144711.b36579361819d4520bcfbfa4@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: <53A07500.1090804@googlemail.com> References: <20140616201859.08fe8a30e168efbd42071331@comcast.net> <20140617090434.808f07dc8de711afefc8e1d1@comcast.net> <53A07500.1090804@googlemail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.4.2 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1403030841; bh=wcwwOujU+O28N3EztC5yiHH8F6mKZFyWbwoppa2CS8I=; h=Received:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Mime-Version: Content-Type; b=NANvcoDtZb+w21htenosIb9tamfXLKvHD+gZRWhbv3VvAeJWKgWsSfWVCYHVveSNN Iym1OkXkUHwwNjiXznFbA2lNPRGtpx9UbKFulcyoIW1GqlPp4x7/9ZBGHaBu8FW/2G tOizT0HasUunnJtDr1dtZQ7h3KhPe9rDJsK7bJMPJbw+ke6nUYcAkju+w1YiuxYE0l rHYz0b7lzIcAaz8ZNcl9EkoLTR6R3D1PGX1WgIy0X2vjZYQJMtba1hBbSYFRHXh4y3 svNLyCQfnIUlgY/yoFSZwT7QUjBtRYU5tRXN5qztQ5Gd2icMfEfLwIMhIw4YNlvmBg 5pbdiz+rJODzg== X-Archives-Salt: 0c17a864-7a28-4a55-89dd-2769d10ed988 X-Archives-Hash: 01ad07e07023156c9552160f494169cf On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 19:04:00 +0200 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > > nossp seems to disable ssp on general. Still not > a good idea. > I appreciate your concern but, all too often it seems, the notion of "not a good idea" becomes "not a good idea therefore it should be irrevocably disabled for everyone whether they want it or not." An option should never become a law. Frank Peters