From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8602138247 for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 23:57:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 42FA4E0AB1; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 23:57:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from qmta08.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta08.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.80]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61D4AE0AA5 for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 23:57:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta13.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.52]) by qmta08.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id nbr31m00417UAYkA8bxRKj; Sat, 09 Nov 2013 23:57:25 +0000 Received: from crud.chemoelectric.org ([66.41.30.59]) by omta13.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id nbxQ1m0051GXozm8ZbxQzp; Sat, 09 Nov 2013 23:57:25 +0000 Received: by crud.chemoelectric.org (Postfix, from userid 1501) id E70902187418C; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 17:57:23 -0600 (CST) Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2013 17:57:23 -0600 From: Barry Schwartz To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: USB Scanner Problems with Newer Kernels/Libusb Message-ID: <20131109235723.GA29602@crud> References: <20131108222553.33af27243ad5aa2411c3f0ff@comcast.net> <20131109114529.f29b71e10f00f6a8b170d0e8@comcast.net> <20131109204021.GA28493@crud> <20131109163813.e0b90b87aefd17c03054af8c@comcast.net> <20131109221148.GA26666@crud> <20131109182553.e20f212f81585d215108f553@comcast.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20131109182553.e20f212f81585d215108f553@comcast.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1384041445; bh=ihrKgDV39TbeEEHzLFuskfhJzhwXJCrw4wnnLyrOvnY=; h=Received:Received:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=bRubevnSrMsPhYk+NrJv6OCi+xuT3ttI+1Lk2ByOGIm1Pn28uMqmtrFJY52o/1DL9 e+wBq+PQyWb6Z6e3ZJTl/uz+zdetaI4aAfm0jAZGZ4B0YZBD3YM21T7jqLMPsdZG5K heX355IZ92o00ixPhKLbas5/eZkLvQAO2/PQMqNu2gGyCHPRzBLuYgKnuvi6lQ6lla GW/j0YIRugX8qWNUmJF/6Z5VPllWyd43ad+KBxWCZBSZL3kONeyh3Q2V8xTvejha/Y 6M2vDmh3t99vQxXdCICRaen6X/9R94ZVQNGX2Dv7Pg7621ei18fPjakdTfUe7zBe76 owwwN9wLV2DCQ== X-Archives-Salt: 72b8f773-1fe2-44c1-9af9-4270939e2c87 X-Archives-Hash: 2778d0406955a0985ef0b44abadae271 Frank Peters skribis: > Fork? Who's gonna take on that challenge? It seems that a handful > of developers, with their own special and exclusionary agenda, will control > the Linux GE for all time. Forking the bulk of this stuff isn’t very productive, because it’s not good enough to improve upon significantly. At best what can be done by forking is stuff like eudev, hacks to try to minimize the damage. It’s just not competent software, as a whole. What am I to make of it, that I have to use OpenBSD’s pkg-config clone, because the one from freedesktop, the most basic piece of software in the system, does not work correctly? I think they haven’t even done something as simple as properly maintain the serial number of pkg.m4.