public inbox for gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Barry Schwartz <chemoelectric@chemoelectric.org>
To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: USB Scanner Problems with Newer Kernels/Libusb
Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2013 16:11:48 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131109221148.GA26666@crud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131109163813.e0b90b87aefd17c03054af8c@comcast.net>

Frank Peters <frank.peters@comcast.net> skribis:
> Right now I am investigating if I can employ the udev daemon to create
> the necessary devices, when needed, in the /dev tree.  IOW, I want to find
> out if I can just start the daemon, plug in the scanner, and have udev create
> the things I need.  Then, when I am done scanning, I can just shut off the
> daemon.  This method should allow me to use udev (or eudev) only when
> I need to use it.  Otherwise it would not be running.

Maybe you can run it once even as a non-daemon just to create the
device, similarly to running rescan-scsi-bus.

> >  because it is quite a disaster, and is becoming all
> > rolled up in the attempt to turn ‘Linux’ from a kernel into a
> > ‘vertically integrated’ variant of MacOS.
> 
> IMHO, those folks at freedesktop.org are going to destroy the simplicity,
> beauty, and diverse utility of Linux.

Yes. Particularly distressing because they are completely neglecting
GNUstep, which is an existing _thoughtful_ attempt to reconcile
Unix/GNU with an integrated desktop non-Unix folk would find familiar.

> I downloaded and examined sytemd to try to learn more about the udev
> process.  What a convoluted mess!  Compared to the simple and straightforward
> boot-up and device system which I have implemented on my machines, systemd
> is a confusing morass.  For what reason?  I can boot up and configure my
> entire machine using a single bash script of 155 lines (including the comments).
> Why would I want to replace that comfort and ease with the expansive cacophony
> that is systemd?

I like baselayout but as a former Slackware user also have a strong
appreciation of a BSD-style write-a-script-for-each-runlevel. Nothing
could be simpler. I have never investigated systemd too deeply, but
simply know that I am lost trying to play with runlevels on an
Ubuntu/Debian system. (There is also the Hurd approach of not needing
such scripts in the first place, but, alas, that is not transferable
to Linux.)


  reply	other threads:[~2013-11-09 22:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-09  3:25 [gentoo-amd64] USB Scanner Problems with Newer Kernels/Libusb Frank Peters
2013-11-09 12:29 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2013-11-09 16:45   ` Frank Peters
2013-11-09 20:40     ` Barry Schwartz
2013-11-09 21:38       ` Frank Peters
2013-11-09 22:11         ` Barry Schwartz [this message]
2013-11-09 22:57           ` Mark Knecht
2013-11-09 23:10             ` Barry Schwartz
2013-11-10 16:54               ` Tanstaafl
2013-11-10 17:08                 ` Barry Schwartz
2013-11-09 23:25             ` Frank Peters
2013-11-09 23:57               ` Barry Schwartz
2013-11-10  1:30   ` [gentoo-amd64] Re: USB Scanner Problems with Newer Kernels/Libusb [Solved] Frank Peters
2013-11-10  1:53     ` Barry Schwartz
2013-11-10  2:36       ` Frank Peters
2013-11-10  4:26       ` Frank Peters
2013-11-12  0:03       ` Frank Peters
2013-11-12 23:18         ` [gentoo-amd64] " Jörg Schaible
2013-11-13  9:14           ` Paul Jewell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131109221148.GA26666@crud \
    --to=chemoelectric@chemoelectric.org \
    --cc=gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox