From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A91811381F3 for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 19:31:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0DDEEE0B0D; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 19:31:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from qmta14.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta14.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.27.212]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 396CDE0B01 for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 19:31:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta04.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.35]) by qmta14.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 7uzu1m0020lTkoCAEvXW83; Fri, 02 Aug 2013 19:31:30 +0000 Received: from crud.chemoelectric.org ([66.41.30.59]) by omta04.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 7vXV1m0071GXozm8QvXVj1; Fri, 02 Aug 2013 19:31:30 +0000 Received: by crud.chemoelectric.org (Postfix, from userid 1501) id D52D620250F38; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 14:31:28 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 14:31:28 -0500 From: Barry Schwartz To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Libjpeg-Turbo Drops Newer ABIs Message-ID: <20130802193128.GA20024@crud> References: <20130802134502.77231249f8d453dcd846063a@comcast.net> <20130802185032.GA10907@crud> <20130802150629.2beb7329ce7caf8bacd6d375@comcast.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130802150629.2beb7329ce7caf8bacd6d375@comcast.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1375471890; bh=7yulfNfPDFqtpSuw6YQxrDLQR3Sshgqlb56fJ1UQn00=; h=Received:Received:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=b9kvNxrDFAE4SeWbs6k4vpIRpExM7VjC42bpNLzsOHvLCB9Gr4QKT3O+55sXwXzpY Sl4AIbi44ZY/iWHixazmeq/2wdF7oIg2rnxa5D7ni6tP2ETBKOM4WKyeNueHZgkfGU xs4Qqj1IQ3HJT5ZOSHWhRmSzsF1aU5jTgCHkEkJEb6faouLIoxEH/NXj+ndLu0e9By /Ig6hNDA/zdAfeCNbTQyoWMbZGzw/1iSk8VsAR7ORgFM4rBmZoiNu2HhikMBvMN4QZ d05oIkPP177Hm0L5XgdvmG7Vpbr4YT852oA8XHnFg5cg1zbk0IjIzr0WSiuQdJhoRJ X3ww10m9kKGAA== X-Archives-Salt: 0acf20d7-62fa-4d46-97e1-2ebca12fffe8 X-Archives-Hash: 916d234c546d4e22e46596eeb4459878 Frank Peters skribis: > On Fri, 2 Aug 2013 13:50:32 -0500 > Barry Schwartz wrote: > > > > > http://www.libjpeg-turbo.org/About/Jpeg-9 > > > > Basically, it says 7, 8, and now 9 were all a mistake. > > Thanks for this. > > When I visited the home page, that link was staring me in the > face but for some reason I just couldn't see it. Maybe because > it was listed in "Position Statements," which seems more political > than technical. My system (mostly stable) seems to have both jpeg implementations installed, so perhaps, I imagine, it means I could get rid of the media-libs/jpeg 0.62-ABI I currently have, by 'upgrading' my media-libs/libjpeg-turbo. I do not suppose there is any hurry to do anything.