From: Barry Schwartz <chemoelectric@chemoelectric.org>
To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Kernel-3.3.0 and Nvidia-drivers
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 19:34:14 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120320003414.GA3000@crud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK2H+ed4+1ogGFtWfDGDDnPtEL=FbNM8-JbhWzuN6HxkoEEiPw@mail.gmail.com>
Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com> skribis:
> I do have a problem with someone saying 'it's time for everyone to
> give up nvidia-drivers' without demonstrating they know the full
> impact of what they are suggesting. Had Cheng Renquan suggest 'Maybe
> people who don't need anything other than basic X capabilities should
> consider running nouveau' I wouldn't have even chimed in.
Sage Notebook (sage-on-gentoo overlay) can use CUDA as well. I think
you don't have to worry that nvidia-drivers would go away; in the
worst case it would end up in a good overlay. That's unlikely IMO, and
would mostly likely be if there were an established alternative
implementation of CUDA.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-20 3:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-19 16:12 [gentoo-amd64] Kernel-3.3.0 and Nvidia-drivers Frank Peters
2012-03-19 16:35 ` Mark Knecht
2012-03-19 19:05 ` Frank Peters
2012-03-19 19:16 ` Mark Knecht
2012-03-19 19:30 ` Frank Peters
2012-03-19 20:08 ` Mark Knecht
2012-03-19 20:25 ` Paul Hartman
2012-03-19 19:14 ` Cheng Renquan
2012-03-19 19:17 ` Mark Knecht
2012-03-19 21:28 ` Barry Schwartz
2012-03-19 21:40 ` Mark Knecht
2012-03-20 0:34 ` Barry Schwartz [this message]
2012-03-20 4:03 ` Frank Peters
2012-03-20 6:20 ` Barry Schwartz
2012-03-20 18:31 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2012-03-20 18:27 ` Duncan
2012-03-22 16:03 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Mark Knecht
2012-03-22 18:41 ` Frank Peters
2012-03-22 18:58 ` Mark Knecht
2012-03-22 21:18 ` Barry Schwartz
2012-03-22 21:21 ` Barry Schwartz
2012-03-22 21:32 ` Outside of portage (was Re: [gentoo-amd64] Kernel-3.3.0 and Nvidia-drivers) Barry Schwartz
2012-03-22 23:04 ` Paul Hartman
2012-03-22 23:28 ` Barry Schwartz
2012-03-22 23:33 ` Harry Holt
2012-03-23 8:42 ` Benny Pedersen
2012-03-23 13:50 ` Harry Holt
2012-03-23 0:14 ` Gary E. Miller
2012-03-23 1:30 ` Mark Knecht
2012-03-23 1:56 ` Barry Schwartz
2012-03-23 4:05 ` [gentoo-amd64] Re: Outside of portage (was " Duncan
2012-03-23 12:41 ` Outside of portage (was Re: [gentoo-amd64] " Frank Peters
2012-03-23 15:49 ` Barry Schwartz
2012-03-23 18:09 ` Dale
2012-03-23 18:28 ` [gentoo-amd64] Kernel-3.3.0 and Nvidia-drivers Mark Knecht
2012-03-23 19:11 ` Mark Knecht
2012-03-24 0:20 ` Frank Peters
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120320003414.GA3000@crud \
--to=chemoelectric@chemoelectric.org \
--cc=gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox