From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QeWTd-0008Vv-0c for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 06 Jul 2011 18:05:33 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8F6BE21C0A6 for ; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 18:05:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oproxy8-pub.bluehost.com (oproxy8-pub.bluehost.com [69.89.22.20]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7EE1821C12C for ; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 17:26:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 1730 invoked by uid 0); 6 Jul 2011 17:26:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box443.bluehost.com) (69.89.31.243) by oproxy8.bluehost.com with SMTP; 6 Jul 2011 17:26:48 -0000 Received: from c-66-41-30-59.hsd1.mn.comcast.net ([66.41.30.59] helo=crud.chemoelectric.org) by box443.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QeVs8-0000d3-4Q for gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 06 Jul 2011 11:26:48 -0600 Received: by crud.chemoelectric.org (Postfix, from userid 1501) id B7C9A1800421; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 12:26:46 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 12:26:46 -0500 From: Barry Schwartz To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Glibc Update Breaks Open/LibreOffice -- Can't Downgrade Message-ID: <20110706172646.GA18733@crud> References: <20110705213148.ca51f2ac.frank.peters@comcast.net> <4749993.gJoIRfyaRY@localhost> <20110705231128.8865f194.frank.peters@comcast.net> <20110706120845.6f111797.frank.peters@comcast.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110706120845.6f111797.frank.peters@comcast.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Identified-User: {1474:box443.bluehost.com:crudfact:crudfactory.com} {sentby:smtp auth 66.41.30.59 authed with crudfactory@crudfactory.com} X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: b8aadb9078c97de02cb97c6553562831 Frank Peters skribis: > What a mess! In my case there would be no problem because > absolutely nothing was built against the new glibc. And the difference between versions may have been trivial, anyway. > So the new question is why does the binary from OO/LO > fail to start while the Gentoo binary shows no problem? > AFAIK they are the same package, but the directory structures > are different. Was one x86 and the other amd64?