From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Qah9n-00008V-Lw for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 04:41:15 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A879B1C021; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 04:39:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from qmta12.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta12.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.27.227]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 639D91C02A for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 04:39:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta19.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.76]) by qmta12.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 0UWY1h0021eYJf8ACUfnWA; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 04:39:47 +0000 Received: from ajax ([24.11.47.14]) by omta19.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 0Ufs1h0020JMh7c01Ufsho; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 04:39:53 +0000 Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 00:39:48 -0400 From: Frank Peters To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Possible Math Problem - Request For Verification [Solved] Message-Id: <20110626003948.bd4b0b83.frank.peters@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: References: <20110625134111.5c6b08dd.frank.peters@comcast.net> <20110625234418.a66f8d7b.frank.peters@comcast.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 53c08564af39bfd4bc0cf935687374cc On Sat, 25 Jun 2011 20:54:10 -0700 Mark Knecht wrote: > > I'm using -O2 here on all my machines. Certainly it isn't that option > that causes a problem for everyone. Sounds like something specific to > your processor revision. > What version of gcc are you using? I was using gcc-4.5.2, which is the latest on Gentoo. Installing gcc-4.4.5, the previous version, into a new slot and then using gcc-4.4.5 to run the ucbtest I do *not* get the cabsd error. So the problem is definitely gcc. All I need now is for someone to come forward and say that he is using gcc-4.5.2 and has no problem. Then I'll really start to bang my head. Frank Peters