From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1PQj6E-0002kb-6g for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 16:12:06 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B6B0DE09FA for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 16:12:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from qmta04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.40]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C158E0636 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 15:28:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta16.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.88]) by qmta04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id h0N71f0051uE5Es543U3S4; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 15:28:03 +0000 Received: from ajax.firstbooks ([68.40.15.84]) by omta16.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id h3U01f00D1op4JC3c3U177; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 15:28:01 +0000 Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 10:27:55 -0500 From: Frank Peters To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] About to install on a 64 bit system. Advice wanted. Message-Id: <20101209102755.48acfc7f.frank.peters@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: <1463292034-1291895910-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1043132697-@b3.c1.bise7.blackberry> References: <4CFFF5DE.20303@gmail.com> <20101208180344.eefa3254.frank.peters@comcast.net> <4D002218.9060302@gmail.com> <4D006923.8050609@gmail.com> <4D00A5ED.3070205@f_philipp.fastmail.net> <1463292034-1291895910-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1043132697-@b3.c1.bise7.blackberry> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.0.3 (GTK+ 2.20.1; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 576c8a60-6ac5-4c21-97ec-4db133da2ce7 X-Archives-Hash: f04eaa3619b821af438bf639df33452e On Thu, 9 Dec 2010 11:58:36 +0000 "Paul Jewell" wrote: > When I installed my system back in January, I started off with 64 bit > only, and immediately hit a problem with grub compilation. Why not just use lilo? Lilo doesn't need the kernel to boot the system and it compiles on pure 64-bit systems. I hate to proselytize, but it seems to me that grub has been pushed into the Linux world without merit. Lilo does the job just as well. Frank Peters