From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <gentoo-amd64+bounces-11932-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>) id 1Mgk5J-0007Hc-Ka for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 18:52:33 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1E9FEE0586; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 00:01:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from QMTA14.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta14.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.27.212]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CABECE0586 for <gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 00:01:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from OMTA10.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.28]) by QMTA14.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id ZWT71c00B0cQ2SLAEc1mKy; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 00:01:46 +0000 Received: from ajax.firstbooks ([68.42.184.188]) by OMTA10.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Zc1k1c00E44JG7Y8Wc1lan; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 00:01:46 +0000 Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 20:01:33 -0400 From: Frank Peters <frank.peters@comcast.net> To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Heads-up: KDEers: Particularly kde3-ers, Message-Id: <20090827200133.c28c92dc.frank.peters@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: <200908280034.24940.volkerarmin@googlemail.com> References: <pan.2009.08.23.14.16.04@cox.net> <200908272114.25652.volkerarmin@googlemail.com> <6f415e5873ca838bb1d56c2e02086912.squirrel@jesgue.homelinux.org> <200908280034.24940.volkerarmin@googlemail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.7.0 (GTK+ 2.16.5; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-amd64+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-amd64+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-amd64+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-amd64.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 6f1f10ae-eaba-441c-81a3-c6c97d4c3593 X-Archives-Hash: 1916a0a8915fb16fbfcedf09a95509f8 On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 00:34:24 +0200 > > oh really? can mc present an audiocd as ogg/mp3/flac/wav files? > > I don't think so. I am not sure what is meant by "present an audio cd," but mc can be programmed by the user to accomplish a lot of tasks based on the file type. Therefore, although I have not researched this specific possibility, I would be inclined to believe that it can be done with mc. Most importantly, mc could do it without requiring the support of hundreds of extra libraries. The more complex a structure, the more difficult it becomes to eliminate or even locate problems and flaws. One can also argue that the whole idea of an evolving graphical interface is a fallacy. Human beings do not need any new and improved methods for interacting with a computer. In my opinion, the GUI had reached its peak way back in 1995. Nothing else needs to be done. Current GUI designs should be sufficient for the next thousand years. > well, I am just saying that even if Frank things highly integrated, code and > functionanilty sharing DEs might be superfluos I am thinking the exact > opposite. > It's all a matter of personal preference and philosophy. I am a minimalist at heart and I'm sure a lot of other people are as well. For me, using a computer means interacting closely with the hardware without the intervention of a thick layer of GUI. I derive much satisfaction with being able to write bash scripts or perl/python code to do jobs that other users could probably accomplish with a few mouse clicks within KDE or Gnome. To me, the whole point of computing is to be in total awareness and control of the computer. Fortunately, Linux (and Gentoo) still provides that minimalist opportunity. Frank Peters