From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LCAZ3-00051J-EM for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 10:20:37 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 393B7E0913; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 10:20:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hades.rz.tu-clausthal.de (hades.rz.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.2.20]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0899FE0913 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 10:20:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hades.rz.tu-clausthal.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 6D41520B0EB for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 11:20:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from tu-clausthal.de (poseidon [139.174.2.21]) by hades.rz.tu-clausthal.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DF4820AE29 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 11:20:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from [139.174.197.94] (account wevah HELO energy.localnet) by tu-clausthal.de (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.10) with ESMTPSA id 39619835 for gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 11:20:35 +0100 From: Volker Armin Hemmann To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] ASUS M2A-VM and kernel 2.6.27 Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 11:20:31 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.10.92 (Linux/2.6.27.8r4_ehci; KDE/4.1.85; x86_64; ; ) References: <20081214183300.3ef9d3f1@osage.osagesoftware.com> In-Reply-To: <20081214183300.3ef9d3f1@osage.osagesoftware.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200812151120.31332.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> X-Virus-Scanned: by PureMessage V5.5 at tu-clausthal.de X-Archives-Salt: 248943a2-10c8-41ee-b551-4bc1966de4d4 X-Archives-Hash: 5a0bc48041d1a0bc6b4493ef437f6a2c On Montag 15 Dezember 2008, David Relson wrote: > The 2.6.25 kernel ran fine for several months before these started > appearing, so I suspect a hardware issue. However, when running > 2.6.27's "make xconfig" I noticed there's an AMD_IOMMU option. I'd > very much like to see if it relates to the messages above. it is very, very unlikely. The desktop amd 'iommu' is the agpgart - and that is unrelated to that option