Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Symlinks vs. Bind mounts.

[Matthias Bethke <matthias@towiski.de>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1484 bytes --]

Hi Juan,
on Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 05:18:53AM -0300, you wrote:
>> If I follow this advice, what happens when I compile something like
>> Open Office which allocates 3-4GB in /var/tmp during compilation and
>> I only have 2GB physical RAM in the computer?
>
> If all the Virtual Memory (VM = RAM+SWAP) is exhausted the kernel will try 
> to kill the process that is consuming most of it.

That's why tmpfs also uses swapspace. Given the address space you have
on a 64bit system, I don't see any reason[0] to save swapspace any
more---after I tried the tmpfs idea for the first time, I just
repartitioned my system for 32 GiB of swap and put /tmp and
/var/tmp/portage on tmpfs. Just perfect.
Not only does this speed up everything that uses temporary files, it
also minimizes the effect of programs that fragment or leak their
memory, like FF2 that had a habit of packing small cached things after
big ones and then not reusing the big ones after they had been freed and
thus ballooning to perverse sizes. I've seen a Firefox grow to over 10
GiB (at 4 GB physical RAM) with minimal impact on the rest of the system
because the hardly ever touched pages just get paged out at some point
and don't matter as long as they stay on disk.

cheers,
	Matthias

[0] OK, there is small overhead due to larger page tables but it's
negligible.
-- 
I prefer encrypted and signed messages. KeyID: FAC37665
Fingerprint: 8C16 3F0A A6FC DF0D 19B0  8DEF 48D9 1700 FAC3 7665

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]