From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K2KiC-0001q1-D2 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 31 May 2008 06:37:08 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F3A02E02BC; Sat, 31 May 2008 06:36:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.152]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B77A0E029E for ; Sat, 31 May 2008 06:36:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id d23so395174fga.14 for ; Fri, 30 May 2008 23:36:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Yc2V2199JKWbFntDHCbAUejIOINGsCHNFDENd/ZaaWk=; b=Tk+RHkNltGfIVvlzaMt7HCYVx/iMEb8KVmR/Dq3aEyCTrB9vVpTYCv+ojqstqrh+xsOfYkEjTXrhLFQuEkoTLc2Uv/n4qud8YpaNYMsWwHX4Rv7/KJ/Z865TV0YXeftFBsVO+jUD/bdtMo0esZExfryGfWJpbb+w3V6YraN1EHc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=bbs+9mNZGvsgnJghedr8vBsTwJDRUgh1hDlFyTLp3AuVIgb/Wk+tiEw7c8+NTXCLRfYtKdOPGwBQnZlC4dFhfa3KwCgBGO6/GiwCzad5LceMG+lDirIianm05SkVOQNvHatm6wo3qrOuRn1iVtHjrawRTPrKE1+B463p08PJVLs= Received: by 10.86.78.4 with SMTP id a4mr519933fgb.29.1212215817714; Fri, 30 May 2008 23:36:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cuci ( [82.208.183.236]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l19sm1169452fgb.7.2008.05.30.23.36.53 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 30 May 2008 23:36:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 09:36:55 +0300 From: ionut cucu To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: KDE 4.0.4 upgrade, sort of. Message-ID: <20080531093655.02295e9f@cuci> In-Reply-To: <200805310017.55820.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> References: <483D3324.3030709@ercbroadband.org> <200805302310.01222.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> <200805302216.42950.levertond@googlemail.com> <200805310017.55820.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.3.1 (GTK+ 2.12.9; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 252291c0-b910-425c-928c-cd457745b180 X-Archives-Hash: 2c9146fc36cb72fc20a5963e0869ddb3 On Sat, 31 May 2008 00:17:55 +0200 "Hemmann, Volker Armin" wrote: > On Freitag, 30. Mai 2008, David Leverton wrote: > > On Friday 30 May 2008 22:10:00 Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: > > > On Freitag, 30. Mai 2008, David Leverton wrote: > > > oh really? > > > > > > I don't think so. > > > > You also "think" that > > * it's Paludis's fault that the maintainers of some of the overlays > > I use chose to commit eclasses with the same names as those in the > > tree > > * package.mask syntax, that I explicitly stated was supported by > > Portage when I first mentioned it, is invalid > > > > Please forgive me if I don't find your li^W"opinions" very > > compelling. > > you just call me liar - but you do nothing to prove that. On the mean > time, I gave you some links. > > So, in my opinion, you are just a pro-paludis troll. > > And from what I can see, trolls are the prefered audience and power > behind paludis. Here you're doing it again. Dude you're personal, stop offending people, should you wanna make a point you're doing it all wrong: give numbers, links, ideas, benchamrks, facts and stop offending people!! -- gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org mailing list