From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K2CvA-00073m-GX for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 30 May 2008 22:18:00 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 125F7E048F; Fri, 30 May 2008 22:17:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hades.rz.tu-clausthal.de (hades.rz.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.2.20]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC115E048F for ; Fri, 30 May 2008 22:17:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hades.rz.tu-clausthal.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 40AD1208D03 for ; Sat, 31 May 2008 00:17:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from tu-clausthal.de (poseidon [139.174.2.21]) by hades.rz.tu-clausthal.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30CDF208C4D for ; Sat, 31 May 2008 00:17:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from energy.heim10.tu-clausthal.de (account wevah [139.174.197.94] verified) by tu-clausthal.de (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.3) with ESMTPSA id 34729916 for gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 31 May 2008 00:17:58 +0200 From: "Hemmann, Volker Armin" To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: KDE 4.0.4 upgrade, sort of. Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 00:17:55 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 References: <483D3324.3030709@ercbroadband.org> <200805302310.01222.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> <200805302216.42950.levertond@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <200805302216.42950.levertond@googlemail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200805310017.55820.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> X-Virus-Scanned: by PureMessage V5.4 at tu-clausthal.de X-Archives-Salt: b7b1b322-3ff0-4da0-8926-81a3730704ba X-Archives-Hash: 1405b6bb6c2a3559d23905fad0db7ae7 On Freitag, 30. Mai 2008, David Leverton wrote: > On Friday 30 May 2008 22:10:00 Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: > > On Freitag, 30. Mai 2008, David Leverton wrote: > > oh really? > > > > I don't think so. > > You also "think" that > * it's Paludis's fault that the maintainers of some of the overlays I use > chose to commit eclasses with the same names as those in the tree > * package.mask syntax, that I explicitly stated was supported by Portage > when I first mentioned it, is invalid > > Please forgive me if I don't find your li^W"opinions" very compelling. you just call me liar - but you do nothing to prove that. On the mean time, I gave you some links. So, in my opinion, you are just a pro-paludis troll. And from what I can see, trolls are the prefered audience and power behind paludis. -- gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org mailing list