From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K2BzT-0002i5-WB for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 30 May 2008 21:18:24 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B8749E0431; Fri, 30 May 2008 21:18:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from poseidon.rz.tu-clausthal.de (poseidon.rz.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.2.21]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BD6EE0431 for ; Fri, 30 May 2008 21:18:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from poseidon.rz.tu-clausthal.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 016EC20947E for ; Fri, 30 May 2008 23:18:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from tu-clausthal.de (poseidon [139.174.2.21]) by poseidon.rz.tu-clausthal.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4204209478 for ; Fri, 30 May 2008 23:18:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from energy.heim10.tu-clausthal.de (account wevah [139.174.197.94] verified) by tu-clausthal.de (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.3) with ESMTPSA id 34729481 for gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 30 May 2008 23:18:21 +0200 From: "Hemmann, Volker Armin" To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: KDE 4.0.4 upgrade, sort of. Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 23:18:18 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 References: <483D3324.3030709@ercbroadband.org> <200805302216.07276.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> <200805302128.47697.levertond@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <200805302128.47697.levertond@googlemail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200805302318.18720.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> X-Virus-Scanned: by PureMessage V5.4 at tu-clausthal.de X-Archives-Salt: 52a8d304-7c97-48c1-931c-4907074b8fbd X-Archives-Hash: f0f882873d1c7626e01dc0e507152203 On Freitag, 30. Mai 2008, David Leverton wrote: > On Friday 30 May 2008 21:16:06 Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: > > On Freitag, 30. Mai 2008, Duncan wrote: > > > I've not done paludis due to its lack of binary package support. Even > > > tho I'm running only a single computer > > > > there is another reason not to use paludis: > > > > you can't go back. > > > > At least not easily. > > That is a vicious, ridiculous lie (and the rest only gets worse). http://www.gentooexperimental.org/not-the-gwn/not-the-gwn-current.html for some numbers. typical paludis-supporter behaviour: http://r0bertz.blogspot.com/2007/01/be-careful-when-you-are-on-paludis.html ciaranm, known to game the system. Abusive against users. rbrown&spb, just removed because of their abusive behaviour. And think about that: why is there a whole bunch of paludis support threads in f.g.o? And why is there not one for pkgcore? (hint, because it is so easy to use) -- gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org mailing list