* [gentoo-amd64] OS setting in BIOS @ 2008-05-25 11:40 Peter Humphrey 2008-05-25 16:02 ` Mike Doty 2008-05-25 16:31 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan 0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Peter Humphrey @ 2008-05-25 11:40 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-amd64 I was poking around in my BIOS this morning and rediscovered a setting to define the installed OS. I'd wondered about it some time ago and then forgotten about it. I can set the BIOS setting "OS Installation" to "Other" or to "64bit Linux 2.6.9". I have it set to Other at the moment. My questions are: what effect this setting is likely to have, and whether it's really specific to the version. This is a Supermicro H8DCE motherboard with dual Opteron 246s and 4GB RAM in four banks, two connected to each CPU. I've tried Google but found nothing. -- Rgds Peter -- gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-amd64] OS setting in BIOS 2008-05-25 11:40 [gentoo-amd64] OS setting in BIOS Peter Humphrey @ 2008-05-25 16:02 ` Mike Doty 2008-05-27 11:09 ` Peter Humphrey 2008-05-25 16:31 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan 1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Mike Doty @ 2008-05-25 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-amd64 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Peter Humphrey wrote: | I was poking around in my BIOS this morning and rediscovered a setting to | define the installed OS. I'd wondered about it some time ago and then | forgotten about it. | | I can set the BIOS setting "OS Installation" to "Other" or to "64bit Linux | 2.6.9". I have it set to Other at the moment. My questions are: what effect | this setting is likely to have, and whether it's really specific to the | version. | | This is a Supermicro H8DCE motherboard with dual Opteron 246s and 4GB RAM in | four banks, two connected to each CPU. | | I've tried Google but found nothing. | Supermicro would be able to tell you. It most likely affects boot order and/or ACPI tables/features. - -- ======================================================= Mike Doty kingtaco -at- gentoo.org Gentoo Infrastructure Gentoo/AMD64 Strategic Lead GPG: E1A5 1C9C 93FE F430 C1D6 F2AF 806B A2E4 19F4 AE05 ======================================================= -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQECAAYFAkg5jXgACgkQgGui5Bn0rgUydwQAotcX962rZk+8u7IMJYRqDUNT W9V0DjT+pyPWnBgK9f2YiJgBoOCH7QyAEXKHexuy1j4RYQIkY4ijhVw0FQtTr3Qo Ow0m/jI/SeBkNxU/jkStFMY/4bSMF1VIUU9aWvGcoNI5aCGnGmZCQ1I05LuV6BPP xkiCw8s8l+W+BkSz5E4= =6pAY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-amd64] OS setting in BIOS 2008-05-25 16:02 ` Mike Doty @ 2008-05-27 11:09 ` Peter Humphrey 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Peter Humphrey @ 2008-05-27 11:09 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-amd64 On Sunday 25 May 2008 17:02:07 Mike Doty wrote: > Peter Humphrey wrote: > | I was poking around in my BIOS this morning and rediscovered a setting > | to define the installed OS. I'd wondered about it some time ago and > | then forgotten about it. > | > | I can set the BIOS setting "OS Installation" to "Other" or to "64bit > Linux > | 2.6.9". I have it set to Other at the moment. My questions are: what > effect > | this setting is likely to have, and whether it's really specific to the > | version. > | > | This is a Supermicro H8DCE motherboard with dual Opteron 246s and 4GB > RAM in > | four banks, two connected to each CPU. > | > | I've tried Google but found nothing. > > Supermicro would be able to tell you. It most likely affects boot order > and/or ACPI tables/features. Well, I tried it to see. At the next boot, one of the two drives in software RAID-1 had two faulty partitions, and the whole physical disk seemed to be the cause of numerous long timeouts and resulting failure messages during boot. So I've put it back :-) The problem could equally have been due to a dodgy disk, or even the SATA interface on the motherboard. I'll have to keep an eye on it. Sometimes an experiment results in a lot of work - in this case, multi-GB of backup and restore, and I've still to found out why the rescue system, which is on an ordinary IDE disk, won't boot. Too many coincidences for my liking. -- Rgds Peter -- gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-amd64] Re: OS setting in BIOS 2008-05-25 11:40 [gentoo-amd64] OS setting in BIOS Peter Humphrey 2008-05-25 16:02 ` Mike Doty @ 2008-05-25 16:31 ` Duncan 1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Duncan @ 2008-05-25 16:31 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-amd64 Peter Humphrey <peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> posted 200805251240.17699.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org, excerpted below, on Sun, 25 May 2008 12:40:17 +0100: > I was poking around in my BIOS this morning and rediscovered a setting > to define the installed OS. I'd wondered about it some time ago and then > forgotten about it. > > I can set the BIOS setting "OS Installation" to "Other" or to "64bit > Linux 2.6.9". I have it set to Other at the moment. My questions are: > what effect this setting is likely to have, and whether it's really > specific to the version. > > This is a Supermicro H8DCE motherboard with dual Opteron 246s and 4GB > RAM in four banks, two connected to each CPU. > > I've tried Google but found nothing. Hmm... The most apropos thing I could find with Linux 2.6.9 was that it introduced AMD dual-core support. This of course assumes that your board is upgradable to dual-cores or that's obviously /not/ what it's referencing. Anyway, Opteron 246s are still single-cores, so if that's it, the setting probably won't matter to you at this point. However, if you upgrade to dual-cores, you may wish to try toggling that setting along with your kernel config updates turning on multi-core support, or it's likely not to work quite as efficiently. I'm guessing the alternative presents the cores as separate CPUs, less confusing for the OS if it didn't know about multi-cores, but not as efficient scheduling as you'd get with the kernel's multi-core scheduling support, which with multi-core scheduling enabled, knows they are on the same chip and thus that it costs less to transfer a job from one core to the other than to a core on another chip. I'm not sure about it, but the more I think about it, the more likely that possibility seems to me. If that's not it, it's sure a good fit for the bit we /do/ know, that (1) the option is 64-bit related (the option says so), that (2) it's a kernel 2.6.9 change (the option says so), that (3) it's Linux specific (the option says so), that (4) it's an AMD system, and that (5) the matching kernel (2+3) added support for the matching brand (4) and that it was 64-bit related (1). If that's a simply coincidental set of matches, it's VERY coincidental. -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman -- gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-05-27 11:29 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2008-05-25 11:40 [gentoo-amd64] OS setting in BIOS Peter Humphrey 2008-05-25 16:02 ` Mike Doty 2008-05-27 11:09 ` Peter Humphrey 2008-05-25 16:31 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox