[gentoo-amd64] emul-linux-x86-soundlibs/emul-linux-x86-qtlibs emerge loop

[gentoo-amd64] emul-linux-x86-soundlibs/emul-linux-x86-qtlibs emerge loop

[Mark Knecht]

Hi all,
   I seem to be stuck in a bit of an emerge loop and I can't find my way out.

1) A number of apps depend on emul-linux-x86-soundlibs.

2) emul-linux-x86-soundlibs depends on emul-linux-x86-qtlibs

3) emul-linux-x86-qtlibs wants emul-linux-x86-soundlibs compiled with arts

4) Attempting to rebuild emul-linux-x86-soundlibs with arts tries to
rebuild emul-linux-x86-qtlibs which fails because
emul-linux-x86-soundlibs doesn't have arts.

   How do I get out of this loop?

Thanks in advance,
Mark


* Messages for package app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-qtlibs-20071210:

 *
 *       emul-linux-x86-qtlibs requires arts support in
app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-soundlibs.
 *       Please compile app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-soundlibs with USE=arts
 *       enabled and then re-merge this package.
 *
 *
 * ERROR: app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-qtlibs-20071210 failed.
 * Call stack:
 *                               ebuild.sh, line   46:  Called pkg_setup
 *   emul-linux-x86-qtlibs-20071210.ebuild, line   22:  Called die
 * The specific snippet of code:
 *              die "app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-soundlibs must have
arts useflag turned on"
 *  The die message:
 *   app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-soundlibs must have arts useflag turned on
 *
 * If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call
stack if relevant.
 * A complete build log is located at
'/var/tmp/portage/app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-qtlibs-20071210/temp/build.log'.
 * The ebuild environment file is located at
'/var/tmp/portage/app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-qtlibs-20071210/temp/die.env'.
 *

lightning ~ # emerge -pv -1 emul-linux-x86-soundlibs

These are the packages that would be merged, in order:

Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild     U ] app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-qtlibs-20071210 [10.0] 0 kB
[ebuild   R   ] app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-soundlibs-20071114-r1
USE="arts* oss -esd" 0 kB

Total: 2 packages (1 upgrade, 1 reinstall), Size of downloads: 0 kB


lightning ~ # equery depends emul-linux-x86-soundlibs
[ Searching for packages depending on emul-linux-x86-soundlibs... ]
app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-java-1.6.0.03 (alsa?
app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-soundlibs)
app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-medialibs-20071114
(>=app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-soundlibs-20071114)
app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-sdl-20071121
(>=app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-soundlibs-20071114)
app-emulation/wine-0.9.54 (amd64? >=app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-soundlibs-2.1)
media-video/mplayer-bin-1.0_rc1-r3
(>=app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-soundlibs-10.0)
net-www/netscape-flash-9.0.115.0 (amd64? app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-soundlibs)


lightning ~ # equery depends emul-linux-x86-qtlibs
[ Searching for packages depending on emul-linux-x86-qtlibs... ]
app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-soundlibs-20071114-r1 (arts?
>=app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-qtlibs-20071114)
lightning ~ #
-- 
gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-amd64] emul-linux-x86-soundlibs/emul-linux-x86-qtlibs emerge loop

[Sebastian Redl]

Mark Knecht wrote:

>Hi all,
>   I seem to be stuck in a bit of an emerge loop and I can't find my way out.
>
>1) A number of apps depend on emul-linux-x86-soundlibs.
>
>2) emul-linux-x86-soundlibs depends on emul-linux-x86-qtlibs
>
>3) emul-linux-x86-qtlibs wants emul-linux-x86-soundlibs compiled with arts
>  
>
I was in the same loop. I broke it by compiling an earlier version of 
one of the two packages first, which didn't have the requirement. But I 
can't remember which one I compiled first.

Sebastian Redl
-- 
gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-amd64] emul-linux-x86-soundlibs/emul-linux-x86-qtlibs emerge loop

[Barry Schwartz]

Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com> skribis:
> Hi all,
>    I seem to be stuck in a bit of an emerge loop and I can't find my way out.
> 
> 1) A number of apps depend on emul-linux-x86-soundlibs.
> 
> 2) emul-linux-x86-soundlibs depends on emul-linux-x86-qtlibs
> 
> 3) emul-linux-x86-qtlibs wants emul-linux-x86-soundlibs compiled with arts
> 
> 4) Attempting to rebuild emul-linux-x86-soundlibs with arts tries to
> rebuild emul-linux-x86-qtlibs which fails because
> emul-linux-x86-soundlibs doesn't have arts.
> 
>    How do I get out of this loop?

I would try --nodeps

I've never tried --nodeps so don't blame me when your computer
explodes.
-- 
gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-amd64] emul-linux-x86-soundlibs/emul-linux-x86-qtlibs emerge loop

[Olivier Crête]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 800 bytes --]

Hi.

On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 12:53 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
> Hi all,
>    I seem to be stuck in a bit of an emerge loop and I can't find my way out.
> 
> 1) A number of apps depend on emul-linux-x86-soundlibs.
> 
> 2) emul-linux-x86-soundlibs depends on emul-linux-x86-qtlibs
> 
> 3) emul-linux-x86-qtlibs wants emul-linux-x86-soundlibs compiled with arts
> 
> 4) Attempting to rebuild emul-linux-x86-soundlibs with arts tries to
> rebuild emul-linux-x86-qtlibs which fails because
> emul-linux-x86-soundlibs doesn't have arts.
> 
>    How do I get out of this loop?

The emul-linux* packages are binary, so the order in which you merged
them doesnt matter, you can just merged both with --nodeps and you will
be fine.

-- 
Olivier Crête
tester@gentoo.org
Gentoo Developer

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-amd64] emul-linux-x86-soundlibs/emul-linux-x86-qtlibs emerge loop

[Mark Knecht]

On Jan 29, 2008 4:14 PM, Olivier Crête <tester@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 12:53 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >    I seem to be stuck in a bit of an emerge loop and I can't find my way out.
> >
> > 1) A number of apps depend on emul-linux-x86-soundlibs.
> >
> > 2) emul-linux-x86-soundlibs depends on emul-linux-x86-qtlibs
> >
> > 3) emul-linux-x86-qtlibs wants emul-linux-x86-soundlibs compiled with arts
> >
> > 4) Attempting to rebuild emul-linux-x86-soundlibs with arts tries to
> > rebuild emul-linux-x86-qtlibs which fails because
> > emul-linux-x86-soundlibs doesn't have arts.
> >
> >    How do I get out of this loop?
>
> The emul-linux* packages are binary, so the order in which you merged
> them doesnt matter, you can just merged both with --nodeps and you will
> be fine.
>
> --
> Olivier Crête
> tester@gentoo.org
> Gentoo Developer
>

Thanks Olivier. That seems to have worked. Is this an ebuild bug that
should be reported?

thanks,
Mark
--
gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-amd64] emul-linux-x86-soundlibs/emul-linux-x86-qtlibs emerge loop

[Scott]

On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 11:14:37 +1100
Olivier Crête <tester@gentoo.org> wrote:

> Hi.
> 
> On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 12:53 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >    I seem to be stuck in a bit of an emerge loop and I can't find
> > my way out.
> > 
> > 1) A number of apps depend on emul-linux-x86-soundlibs.
> > 
> > 2) emul-linux-x86-soundlibs depends on emul-linux-x86-qtlibs
> > 
> > 3) emul-linux-x86-qtlibs wants emul-linux-x86-soundlibs compiled
> > with arts
> > 
> > 4) Attempting to rebuild emul-linux-x86-soundlibs with arts tries to
> > rebuild emul-linux-x86-qtlibs which fails because
> > emul-linux-x86-soundlibs doesn't have arts.
> > 
> >    How do I get out of this loop?
> 
> The emul-linux* packages are binary, so the order in which you merged
> them doesnt matter, you can just merged both with --nodeps and you
> will be fine.
> 
I just dealt with the same issue myself.What I did was "emerge -c
emul-linux-x86-soundlibs" (emerge -C unmerges), "echo
"app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-soundlibs
arts" /etc/portage/package.use" , "emerge emul-linux-x86-soundlibs"

That solved it for me hope this helps

-Scott
--
gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-amd64] emul-linux-x86-soundlibs/emul-linux-x86-qtlibs emerge loop

[David Fellows]

On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 17:10:47 -0800 
"Mark Knecht" wrote -
Snip...

> 
> Thanks Olivier. That seems to have worked. Is this an ebuild bug that
> should be reported?

Probably not. There are a number of related bug entries already. See, 
for example,200171.

DaveF
-- 
gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org mailing list