public inbox for gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Conway S. Smith" <beolach@comcast.net>
To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64]  Re: Planning a new box - AMD Opteron or Intel Xeon?
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 19:55:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071111195551.6c0716d7@mandalor.homelinux.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pan.2007.11.12.01.43.48@cox.net>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2543 bytes --]

On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 01:43:48 +0000 (UTC)
Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> wrote:
> "Conway S. Smith" <beolach@comcast.net> posted
> 20071111053814.06ce20f3@mandalor.homelinux.net, excerpted below, on
> Sun, 11 Nov 2007 05:38:14 -0700:
> 
> > Well, I've been looking at the new Barcelona Opteron 2300 series,
> > which have 4 cores each & can be used in dual socket motherboards,
> > for a total of 8 cores in the system.  The 2 or 4 cores in an
> > Athlon X2 system really would be sufficient for my needs, but then
> > my current box is still pretty much sufficient for my needs.  This
> > new box I'm planning is more about my wants, and I look at 8 cores
> > & think "I want!"
> 
> For general workstation use, including Gentoo, 4 cores should be
> about enough for now.  Same with 4 gig of memory.  I went with 8 gig
> memory, but if I had it to do over I'd stick with 4 gig and get the
> dual-cores sooner.
> 

The thing is, I'm really not much of an upgrader - at least, not
replacement-type upgrades, like CPUs.  I'd rather get 4 cores now,
instead of getting 2 cores & later upgrading to 4, because then I'd
have the 2 core CPUs lying around, and much as I might think that I'd
find some use for them, my experience has been that they'd just end up
in a box (cardboard, not computer) gathering dust.  And as I've been
pricing things, I've been rather impressed w/ how the 4 core Barcelonas
are priced compared w/ similarly clocked 2 core Santa Rosas.

Memory, on the other hand, is easier to upgrade just by adding
additional sticks, so I might just start w/ 4 GiB & plan on adding more
later.

> The more cores you get, the more things have to parallelize in
> ordered to use them.  It's coming, but really isn't there yet.  There
> are too many makefiles that haven't been designed with massive
> parallelization in mind.
> 
> Of course, there are applications where 8-core is useful.  Just not
> for general Gentoo desktop/workstation use, IMO.  A pair of 30" Apple
> Cinema (like 2900x1600 or some such, resolution) or comparable LCDs
> and a decent GPU (or set of GPUs) to run them seems better use of
> that sort of money, to me, and what I'm looking at for next upgrade
> after my eyes (lasik).
> 

I actually already have a Samsung 305T 30" monitor, that's very similar
to the Apple Cinema, but slightly cheaper & better response time.  And
it (just the one) was more expensive than I expect I'll be shelling out
for the 2x4 core CPUs + motherboard.


Thanks,
Conway S. Smith

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2007-11-12  3:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-10 15:11 [gentoo-amd64] Planning a new box - AMD Opteron or Intel Xeon? Conway S. Smith
2007-11-10 16:28 ` Kris Kersey (Augustus)
2007-11-10 16:52   ` Conway S. Smith
2007-11-10 17:43     ` Beso
2007-11-11 12:38       ` Conway S. Smith
2007-11-11 13:23         ` Beso
2007-11-12  1:43         ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2007-11-12  2:55           ` Conway S. Smith [this message]
2007-11-12 17:42         ` [gentoo-amd64] " Bob Sanders
2007-11-10 23:20     ` Kris Kersey (Augustus)
2007-11-11 14:03   ` Bernhard Auzinger
2007-11-12  1:50     ` Richard Freeman
2007-11-12 14:39     ` Kris Kersey (Augustus)
2007-11-10 17:22 ` P.V.Anthony
2007-11-10 23:21   ` Kris Kersey (Augustus)
2007-11-12 16:55     ` Bob Sanders

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071111195551.6c0716d7@mandalor.homelinux.net \
    --to=beolach@comcast.net \
    --cc=gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox