From: Bernhard Auzinger <e0026053@student.tuwien.ac.at>
To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] compiling on dual-cores - only 50% usage per cpu
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 14:03:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200711111403.37985.e0026053@student.tuwien.ac.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200711110936.23412.prh@gotadsl.co.uk>
Am Sonntag 11 November 2007 schrieb Peter Humphrey:
> On Saturday 10 Nov 2007, Bernhard Auzinger wrote:
> > it's not a important question, but has anybody of you noticed when
> > compiling certain packages the load on both cpu's is only about 50%. I
> > have the feeling that it happens with packages that can not be split up
> > into two jobs. But in this case one cpu should be on 100% load and the
> > other one at ~0%. Maybe someone of you has a good explanation for this
> > behaviour.
>
> I posted a question like this a few months ago, and I did a fair amount of
> detective work. Pretty much inconclusive, I'm afraid, but it seemed to be
> due to a motherboard chipset problem. This is a SuperMicro H8DCE; the
> problem only appeared when this replaced a faulty MSI board. I think the
> conversation ran in May, so you should be able to find it in the archive if
> you're interested.
>
> (I'd noticed that the BOINC scheduler was trying to get two processes run
> at full load, one on each CPU, but according to /top/ and /gkrellm/ each
> was getting just 50%, sometimes one on each CPU and sometimes both on the
> same one. And /top/ seemed confused about which CPU was running which
> tasks!)
>
> I don't run BOINC any more, for other reasons, so I haven't run into the
> problem recently. Kernel compilations seem to go OK, so it's all a bit of a
> mystery. I concluded at the time: "I'm left with a vague feeling of
> dissatisfaction from not knowing what's going on, and a suspicion that
> something in the nForce2 chipset doesn't match what the kernel thinks.
> Kernel versions seem not to affect this problem, at least not in the range
> of versions I could find."
>
> --
> Rgds
> Peter.
> Linux Counter 5290, Aug 93
I don't think that it is a motherboard issue because I watched the same
behaviour not only on my amd64X2 but also at work at a core2-duo and older
pentium4's.
I will try to find the thread from may.
Thank you.
Bernhard
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-11 13:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-10 16:29 [gentoo-amd64] compiling on dual-cores - only 50% usage per cpu Bernhard Auzinger
2007-11-10 17:12 ` Kris Kersey (Augustus)
2007-11-10 17:13 ` Conway S. Smith
2007-11-10 18:22 ` Ângelo Miguel Arrifano
2007-11-10 20:43 ` Bernhard Auzinger
2007-11-11 0:41 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2007-11-11 10:48 ` Bernhard Auzinger
2007-11-12 1:35 ` Duncan
2007-11-11 10:52 ` Bernhard Auzinger
2007-11-11 9:36 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Peter Humphrey
2007-11-11 13:03 ` Bernhard Auzinger [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200711111403.37985.e0026053@student.tuwien.ac.at \
--to=e0026053@student.tuwien.ac.at \
--cc=gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox