public inbox for gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Humphrey <prh@gotadsl.co.uk>
To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] compiling on dual-cores - only 50% usage per cpu
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 09:36:23 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200711110936.23412.prh@gotadsl.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200711101729.24489.e0026053@student.tuwien.ac.at>

On Saturday 10 Nov 2007, Bernhard Auzinger wrote:

> it's not a important question, but has anybody of you noticed when
> compiling certain packages the load on both cpu's is only about 50%. I
> have the feeling that it happens with packages that can not be split up
> into two jobs. But in this case one cpu should be on 100% load and the
> other one at ~0%. Maybe someone of you has a good explanation for this
> behaviour.

I posted a question like this a few months ago, and I did a fair amount of 
detective work. Pretty much inconclusive, I'm afraid, but it seemed to be 
due to a motherboard chipset problem. This is a SuperMicro H8DCE; the 
problem only appeared when this replaced a faulty MSI board. I think the 
conversation ran in May, so you should be able to find it in the archive if 
you're interested.

(I'd noticed that the BOINC scheduler was trying to get two processes run at 
full load, one on each CPU, but according to /top/ and /gkrellm/ each was 
getting just 50%, sometimes one on each CPU and sometimes both on the same 
one. And /top/ seemed confused about which CPU was running which tasks!)

I don't run BOINC any more, for other reasons, so I haven't run into the 
problem recently. Kernel compilations seem to go OK, so it's all a bit of a 
mystery. I concluded at the time: "I'm left with a vague feeling of 
dissatisfaction from not knowing what's going on, and a suspicion that 
something in the nForce2 chipset doesn't match what the kernel thinks. 
Kernel versions seem not to affect this problem, at least not in the range 
of versions I could find."

-- 
Rgds
Peter.
Linux Counter 5290, Aug 93
-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-11-11 12:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-10 16:29 [gentoo-amd64] compiling on dual-cores - only 50% usage per cpu Bernhard Auzinger
2007-11-10 17:12 ` Kris Kersey (Augustus)
2007-11-10 17:13 ` Conway S. Smith
2007-11-10 18:22 ` Ângelo Miguel Arrifano
2007-11-10 20:43   ` Bernhard Auzinger
2007-11-11  0:41     ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2007-11-11 10:48       ` Bernhard Auzinger
2007-11-12  1:35         ` Duncan
2007-11-11 10:52       ` Bernhard Auzinger
2007-11-11  9:36 ` Peter Humphrey [this message]
2007-11-11 13:03   ` [gentoo-amd64] " Bernhard Auzinger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200711110936.23412.prh@gotadsl.co.uk \
    --to=prh@gotadsl.co.uk \
    --cc=gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox