public inbox for gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Conway S. Smith" <beolach@comcast.net>
To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Planning a new box - AMD Opteron or Intel Xeon?
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 09:52:06 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071110095206.7a73544e@mandalor.homelinux.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0711101625470.26994@penguin.linuxhardware.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1211 bytes --]

On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 16:28:01 +0000 (UTC)
"Kris Kersey (Augustus)" <augustus@linuxhardware.org> wrote:
> Conway,
> 
> While it doesn't include Barcelona, you probably would find my review
> on LinuxHardware.org very useful in your decision making process.  It 
> included the latest Xeon and Opteron processors using Tyan boards.
> Here's the link: 
> http://www.linuxhardware.org/article.pl?sid=07/04/05/1414204&mode=thread
> 
> If you have any other questions, I'll be happy to help.
> 
> Thanks,
> Kris Kersey (Augustus)
> LinuxHardware.org Site Manager
> augustus@linuxhardware.org
> Gentoo Linux AMD64 Developer
> augustus@gentoo.org
> AIM: Augustus22
> 

Nice article, thanks Kris!  I'm about to hit the sack (I work nights),
so I've mostly just skimmed the performance section, and I'm rather
pleasantly surprised.

The Opterons are looking a lot better there than some of the other
reviews I've been reading.  The impression I've had was that in terms
of performance, Intel's had a significant lead since the Conroe came
out; although AMD's Barcelona is starting to close the gap (although I
had the impression Intel's Clovertown still leads).


Thanks,
Conway S. Smith

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2007-11-10 17:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-10 15:11 [gentoo-amd64] Planning a new box - AMD Opteron or Intel Xeon? Conway S. Smith
2007-11-10 16:28 ` Kris Kersey (Augustus)
2007-11-10 16:52   ` Conway S. Smith [this message]
2007-11-10 17:43     ` Beso
2007-11-11 12:38       ` Conway S. Smith
2007-11-11 13:23         ` Beso
2007-11-12  1:43         ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2007-11-12  2:55           ` Conway S. Smith
2007-11-12 17:42         ` [gentoo-amd64] " Bob Sanders
2007-11-10 23:20     ` Kris Kersey (Augustus)
2007-11-11 14:03   ` Bernhard Auzinger
2007-11-12  1:50     ` Richard Freeman
2007-11-12 14:39     ` Kris Kersey (Augustus)
2007-11-10 17:22 ` P.V.Anthony
2007-11-10 23:21   ` Kris Kersey (Augustus)
2007-11-12 16:55     ` Bob Sanders

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071110095206.7a73544e@mandalor.homelinux.net \
    --to=beolach@comcast.net \
    --cc=gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox