From: "Conway S. Smith" <beolach@comcast.net>
To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Planning a new box - AMD Opteron or Intel Xeon?
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 09:52:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071110095206.7a73544e@mandalor.homelinux.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0711101625470.26994@penguin.linuxhardware.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1211 bytes --]
On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 16:28:01 +0000 (UTC)
"Kris Kersey (Augustus)" <augustus@linuxhardware.org> wrote:
> Conway,
>
> While it doesn't include Barcelona, you probably would find my review
> on LinuxHardware.org very useful in your decision making process. It
> included the latest Xeon and Opteron processors using Tyan boards.
> Here's the link:
> http://www.linuxhardware.org/article.pl?sid=07/04/05/1414204&mode=thread
>
> If you have any other questions, I'll be happy to help.
>
> Thanks,
> Kris Kersey (Augustus)
> LinuxHardware.org Site Manager
> augustus@linuxhardware.org
> Gentoo Linux AMD64 Developer
> augustus@gentoo.org
> AIM: Augustus22
>
Nice article, thanks Kris! I'm about to hit the sack (I work nights),
so I've mostly just skimmed the performance section, and I'm rather
pleasantly surprised.
The Opterons are looking a lot better there than some of the other
reviews I've been reading. The impression I've had was that in terms
of performance, Intel's had a significant lead since the Conroe came
out; although AMD's Barcelona is starting to close the gap (although I
had the impression Intel's Clovertown still leads).
Thanks,
Conway S. Smith
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-10 17:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-10 15:11 [gentoo-amd64] Planning a new box - AMD Opteron or Intel Xeon? Conway S. Smith
2007-11-10 16:28 ` Kris Kersey (Augustus)
2007-11-10 16:52 ` Conway S. Smith [this message]
2007-11-10 17:43 ` Beso
2007-11-11 12:38 ` Conway S. Smith
2007-11-11 13:23 ` Beso
2007-11-12 1:43 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2007-11-12 2:55 ` Conway S. Smith
2007-11-12 17:42 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Bob Sanders
2007-11-10 23:20 ` Kris Kersey (Augustus)
2007-11-11 14:03 ` Bernhard Auzinger
2007-11-12 1:50 ` Richard Freeman
2007-11-12 14:39 ` Kris Kersey (Augustus)
2007-11-10 17:22 ` P.V.Anthony
2007-11-10 23:21 ` Kris Kersey (Augustus)
2007-11-12 16:55 ` Bob Sanders
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071110095206.7a73544e@mandalor.homelinux.net \
--to=beolach@comcast.net \
--cc=gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox