[gentoo-amd64] gcc 4.2.1 unstable?

[gentoo-amd64] gcc 4.2.1 unstable?

[Joshua Hoblitt]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 482 bytes --]

Hi Folks,

Does anyone know why a gcc > 4.2.1 but < 4.3 ebuild has not appeared in
the toolchain overlay?  I'm assuming that the toolchain herd has decided
to focus on gcc 4.3.x for some reason.  Are there serious problems with
4.2.1 or the 4.2 dev. snapshots?  The reason I ask is that there are
alot of people (i.e., my users) eager for a version of gcc that supports
openmp (like gcc 4.2.1+) and many of the specialized openmp compilers
(like onmi) won't build on amd64.

-J

--

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-amd64] gcc 4.2.1 unstable?

[Volker Armin Hemmann]

On Montag, 8. Oktober 2007, Joshua Hoblitt wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> Does anyone know why a gcc > 4.2.1 but < 4.3 ebuild has not appeared in
> the toolchain overlay? 

maybe because gcc 4.2.1 is in the 'normal' tree already?
And gcc 4.2.1 is the latest 4.2 release?

*  sys-devel/gcc
      Latest version available: 4.2.1
      Latest version installed: 4.2.1

-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-amd64] gcc 4.2.1 unstable?

[Christoph Mende]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 402 bytes --]

On Sun, 7 Oct 2007 14:09:30 -1000
Joshua Hoblitt <jhoblitt@ifa.hawaii.edu> wrote:

> Hi Folks,
> 
> The reason I ask is that there are
> alot of people (i.e., my users) eager for a version of gcc that supports
> openmp (like gcc 4.2.1+) and many of the specialized openmp compilers
> (like onmi) won't build on amd64.

gcc-4.2.0 and gcc-4.2.1 both support openmp and are in the normal tree.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-amd64] gcc 4.2.1 unstable?

[Joshua Hoblitt]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 570 bytes --]

Thanks... I was looking at the wrong internal portage tree. ;)

-J

--
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 03:35:14PM +0200, Christoph Mende wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Oct 2007 14:09:30 -1000
> Joshua Hoblitt <jhoblitt@ifa.hawaii.edu> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Folks,
> > 
> > The reason I ask is that there are
> > alot of people (i.e., my users) eager for a version of gcc that supports
> > openmp (like gcc 4.2.1+) and many of the specialized openmp compilers
> > (like onmi) won't build on amd64.
> 
> gcc-4.2.0 and gcc-4.2.1 both support openmp and are in the normal tree.



[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]