From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IWX59-0006AI-7g for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 15 Sep 2007 12:49:07 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l8FCdm7k020200; Sat, 15 Sep 2007 12:39:48 GMT Received: from poseidon.rz.tu-clausthal.de (poseidon.rz.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.2.21]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l8FCdmWD020194 for ; Sat, 15 Sep 2007 12:39:48 GMT Received: from poseidon.rz.tu-clausthal.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 779A120867B for ; Sat, 15 Sep 2007 14:39:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from tu-clausthal.de (poseidon [139.174.2.21]) by poseidon.rz.tu-clausthal.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68FBB208677 for ; Sat, 15 Sep 2007 14:39:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from energy.heim10.tu-clausthal.de (account wevah [139.174.197.94] verified) by tu-clausthal.de (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.12) with ESMTPSA id 26106814 for gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 15 Sep 2007 14:39:47 +0200 From: Volker Armin Hemmann To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Local network backup Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 14:39:45 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <200709141022.26291.prh@gotadsl.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <200709141022.26291.prh@gotadsl.co.uk> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200709151439.45244.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> X-Virus-Scanned: by PureMessage V5.3 at tu-clausthal.de X-Archives-Salt: c1c99873-e8d4-4af6-84f1-e15765c3182e X-Archives-Hash: 2057ad57e0256b69070a7eb07bfd7d83 On Freitag, 14. September 2007, Peter Humphrey wrote: > Here's today's problem. > > I have a firewall-cum-gateway box between my tiny LAN and the Internet. The > gateway runs constantly, while the internal boxes run when needed (they're > my laptop and workstation). I want to use some space on the gateway to > store backups of the other boxes, and I'd like the backup to run unattended > at a time when the others are likely to be running. This seems not to be > possible without security risks. so you want to store your most sensible data on the box most exposed to attacks? Doesn't that sound strange, when you think about it? -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list