public inbox for gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bob Sanders <rsanders@sgi.com>
To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Is there any difference with 4 core?
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 07:23:22 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070803142322.GA13973@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46B2A986.60406@singnet.com.sg>

P.V.Anthony, mused, then expounded:
> 
> When is Barcelona coming out? Would it be expensive because it is new 
> and a true 4 core chip?
>

Initial ship in about two months.  It'll cost more, but get the Socket F
aka 1207 pin socket if you go AMD.
 
> From reading the posts, it seems that memory is very very important. 
> Wondering if it is better going with a 2 core cpu and put the savings on 
> more ram. Originally thinking of 4g. Maybe the ram should go to 8g.
>

Probably best just to start with 4 G.  More memory can be added later.
On the Intel plaform, get 4 dimms, on the AMD platform 2 dimms is fine.
Whichever you get, pay attention to the bios release notes and memory
RAS features.  You might wany to implement mirroring (doubling the number
of dimms) if uptime is important.
 
> Plus it is paranoia. Just afraid that something on the Pentium 4 might 
> fail. Since it is already two years old.
>

Typically, hard drives - IDE, then SATA, then SAS, and FC, fail first in the
described order from most likely to least likely.
 
> P.V.Anthony
> 
> PS: going with tyan because from this list, it seems that tyan has good 
> support for linux.
>

Tyan makes a very good stable product.  But there will be issues.  There are
always issues.  I've worked a lot with Intel and SuperMicro recently, and both
have strengths and weaknesses.  Personally, I'd stick with Tyan or SuperMicro.

And if you're going to need remote console access make sure you can return the
product if the BMC (Baseband Management Controller) doesn't work well.  You'll
have to pay for a decent BMC.  But one that works is worth every penny.  I haven't
had the opertunity to work with Tyan's BMC, so I really can't comment on them,
but all the others I've used have had issues that needed to be worked out with
the vendor, so the fixes are coming along with updated BMC firmware.

Bob 
-  
-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



      reply	other threads:[~2007-08-03 14:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-08-01 15:16 [gentoo-amd64] Is there any difference with 4 core? P.V.Anthony
2007-08-01 15:27 ` Wil Reichert
2007-08-01 15:41   ` P.V.Anthony
2007-08-01 15:44 ` Bob Sanders
2007-08-01 20:12 ` Martin Nielsen
2007-08-01 23:13 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2007-08-02  8:58 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Pascal BERTIN
2007-08-02  9:57   ` P.V.Anthony
2007-08-02 14:27     ` Bob Sanders
2007-08-03  2:36       ` P.V.Anthony
     [not found]     ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0708021008180.12943@thing.com>
2007-08-03  2:30       ` P.V.Anthony
2007-08-03  3:39         ` Nuitari
2007-08-03  4:05           ` P.V.Anthony
2007-08-03 14:23             ` Bob Sanders [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070803142322.GA13973@sgi.com \
    --to=rsanders@sgi.com \
    --cc=gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox