public inbox for gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Isidore Ducasse <ducasse.isidore@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64]  Re: Sun and GPL
Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 02:41:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070528024149.4f6d918c@Bazaar> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pan.2007.05.27.23.32.49@cox.net>

le Sun, 27 May 2007 23:32:49 +0000 (UTC)
Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> a écrit:

> Not necessarily (or likely) /all/ their software, but significant parts 
> of it.  OpenSolaris is currently CDDL, which /is/ OSI approved as a real 
> "open" license, but was designed in part deliberately to be GPLv2 
> incompatible.  Apparently, they weren't interested in Linux "stealing" 
> their technologies, which they thought would happen if they made it GPLv2 
> compatible.

Solaris' dev team had diverging points of view about GPL being relevant for a private firm as Sun. Now it looks like there was room for a single conception over there.

> They ARE considering dual-licensing Solaris under GPLv3, however, which 
> they've been working closely with the FSF on.  Of course that's not a 
> given until it's out, but it'd definitely widen the interest base (I for 
> one may well be interested, especially if Linux stays GPLv2 only).

You mean the bare kernel, right? Solaris' kernel could be an alternative to linux? Is the latter really different from the *BSD's? I've installed a NetBSD on my machine "for fun" recently (tho I switched back to using my good'ol gentoo, can't get used to anything else now. pkgsrc looks like a sympathetic old auntie); it appears to practice monolithic kernel. What would be different in running a GPLv3 kernel? I've read about the anti-DRM part of it; is there some other reason you/we could be interested in it?

BTW isn't there a technical issue licensing a single version of a soft against two incompatible licenses? Or did you mean dual-licensing GPLv2 and GPLv3?

> Of course Linus and the other kernel devs were originally very much 
> against early GPLv3 drafts.

Is it a matter of diverging positions towards industrial partners/users?

> The Gentoo Java devs are working on it, but as I said, I don't 
> believe enough of the entire Java infrastructure has been released as GPL 
> yet to do the entire thing as sources.  Even after it has, it'll take 
> several months as experimental ebuilds in the Java overlay (emerge layman 
> and read up on using it, if interested)

Ok! Does anyone know the difference between the java-overlay and the java-gcj-overlay?
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-28  0:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-26 19:07 [gentoo-amd64] Can I run a complete desktop remotely? Mark Knecht
2007-05-26 19:37 ` Olivier Crête
2007-05-27 15:40   ` Mark Knecht
2007-05-27 15:56     ` Peter Davoust
2007-05-27 16:04     ` Richard Freeman
2007-05-27 16:56     ` YoYo Siska
2007-05-26 19:49 ` Aleksey Kunitskiy
2007-05-26 19:53 ` Conway S. Smith
2007-05-26 20:29   ` Simon Cooper
2007-05-26 22:24     ` Conway S. Smith
2007-05-26 21:47   ` Nuitari
2007-05-26 22:20     ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2007-05-27  0:00       ` Duncan
2007-05-26 22:51     ` [gentoo-amd64] " Conway S. Smith
2007-05-27  6:48       ` Joerg Gollnick
2007-05-27 10:57         ` Richard Freeman
2007-05-27 11:11         ` [gentoo-amd64] Sun and GPL Isidore Ducasse
2007-05-27 23:32           ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2007-05-28  0:41             ` Isidore Ducasse [this message]
2007-05-28  3:42               ` Wil Reichert
2007-05-28  6:12                 ` Naga
2007-05-28  3:56               ` Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
2007-05-28  9:25                 ` Richard Freeman
2007-05-28 10:42                   ` Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
2007-05-28 10:56                     ` robert burrell donkin
2007-05-28 11:52                     ` Duncan
2007-05-28 16:23                     ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-05-28 17:28                       ` Nuitari
2007-05-28 11:14               ` Duncan
2007-05-28 13:14                 ` Conway S. Smith
2007-05-28 17:46                   ` Duncan
2007-05-28 18:38                     ` [gentoo-amd64] Baselayout 2 (Was: Sun and GPL) Sebastian Redl
2007-05-28 22:56                       ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2007-05-29  0:50                         ` Wil Reichert
2007-05-30  0:33                           ` Florian D.
2007-05-30  4:09                             ` Joshua Hoblitt
2007-05-30  4:38                               ` Wil Reichert
2007-05-30  7:39                                 ` Duncan
2007-05-30  7:43                                 ` Isidore Ducasse
2007-05-30 22:57                                 ` Joshua Hoblitt
2007-05-30  9:12                               ` Florian D.

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070528024149.4f6d918c@Bazaar \
    --to=ducasse.isidore@gmail.com \
    --cc=gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox