From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HprRP-0005nU-NT for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 20 May 2007 19:51:44 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l4KJnb1v016820; Sun, 20 May 2007 19:49:37 GMT Received: from poseidon.rz.tu-clausthal.de (poseidon.rz.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.2.21]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l4KJnbKC016815 for ; Sun, 20 May 2007 19:49:37 GMT Received: from poseidon.rz.tu-clausthal.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id DD235206830 for ; Sun, 20 May 2007 21:49:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from tu-clausthal.de (poseidon [139.174.2.21]) by poseidon.rz.tu-clausthal.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF6C820682F for ; Sun, 20 May 2007 21:49:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from energy.heim10.tu-clausthal.de (account wevah [139.174.197.94] verified) by tu-clausthal.de (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.9) with ESMTPSA id 23044032 for gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 20 May 2007 21:49:36 +0200 From: "Hemmann, Volker Armin" To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Can't build kernel Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 21:49:35 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <724293.99140.qm@web83307.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <724293.99140.qm@web83307.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200705202149.35144.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> X-Virus-Scanned: by PureMessage V4.7 at tu-clausthal.de X-Archives-Salt: a3b57aa1-37e7-4b7c-bc0d-c05c113d425c X-Archives-Hash: e67e9aa49363db5047d199006b53c01e On Sonntag, 20. Mai 2007, Peter Hoff wrote: > ----- Original Message ---- > From: "Hemmann, Volker Armin" > > > I usually remove all the acpi stuff anyway, which is why this message has > > been particularly puzzling. > > well, yeah. Don't do that. As you can see from your error, something needs > it. > > ACPI is needed for a lot more stuff than only 'power managment'. There are > even computers that won't boot without ACPI. > > > Hmm, well that's never been a problem before 2.6.21, and I've tried leaving > the acpi stuff in and got the same error. And actually mine won't boot with > acpi; I have to have acpi=off and noapic set in grub. IIRC, it's because I > have an Nforce 5 chipset, but it's been almost a year since I had to deal > with that so I could be wrong about that being the reason. ok, time to open some bugs. Seriously, if your board does not boot with ACPI, you should open bugs about it. And the problem you have when building kernels (so open two bugs). I had a board that would not find its IDE-ports if not build with ACPI.. > > > And please: > Dont Tofu > Reply to the message, not your original message. > > A lot of people are using mail clients who can thread the messages. You are > destroying that threads. > > > What are you talking about? I never reply to my own messages. Whatever is > destroying your threads is not due to any action of mine. Well, in kmail, all your replys are to your own messages - and it is hard to tell what is quoted and what belongs to you - it is all the same. Since you are the only one, where I have the problem, I blame your mail client ;) -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list