From: Peter Humphrey <prh@gotadsl.co.uk>
To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: [OT] AGPART [SOLVED]
Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 10:49:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200705051049.23193.prh@gotadsl.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pan.2007.05.05.09.15.40@cox.net>
On Saturday 05 May 2007 10:15:41 Duncan wrote:
> Actually, here, I have 8 gigs. That's a bit overkill. I'd probably
> stick with four if I were doing it over, as over four gigs remains
> entirely empty, most of the time, not even used for cache.
Glad to see I got it right, 3.5 years ago :-)
Here also, my 4 GB is at least half-empty unless I'm compiling a large
package like OO.o. My two single-core Opteron 246 CPUs have plenty of
playing space.
> Still, I have dual Opterons now, and was buying with dual-cores in mind.
My experience suggests that you would still have been pretty comfortable
with 4 GB.
> 8 gig of memory should still be plenty with dual dual-cores, even out
> three more years, ...
Well, of course much can happen in that time, so you may be proved right
after all.
> which is when I expect to start getting serious about upgrading my entire
> platform once again.
Don't talk about it, all right? Just don't talk about it.
--
Rgds
Peter Humphrey
Linux Counter 5290, Aug 93
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-05 9:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-04 17:00 [gentoo-amd64] [OT] AGPART Daniel Iliev
2007-05-04 17:36 ` Jeffrey Gardner
2007-05-04 18:21 ` Wil Reichert
2007-05-04 18:47 ` Jeffrey Gardner
2007-05-05 1:58 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2007-05-05 7:58 ` [gentoo-amd64] [OT] AGPART [SOLVED] Daniel Iliev
2007-05-05 9:15 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2007-05-05 9:49 ` Peter Humphrey [this message]
2007-05-05 13:56 ` Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
2007-05-06 14:36 ` [gentoo-amd64] Memory usage Was: " Duncan
2007-05-06 8:34 ` [gentoo-amd64] Re: [OT] AGPART [SOLVED] DRIFT: RAM USAGE Daniel Iliev
2007-05-06 13:36 ` Duncan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200705051049.23193.prh@gotadsl.co.uk \
--to=prh@gotadsl.co.uk \
--cc=gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox