From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from <gentoo-amd64+bounces-7526-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>) id 1Hdw8c-0004Qz-Bj for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 22:27:02 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l3HMNQf6016408; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 22:23:26 GMT Received: from smtp.nildram.co.uk (smtp.nildram.co.uk [195.112.4.54]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l3HMNPUe016398 for <gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 22:23:25 GMT Received: from wstn.prhnet (prh.gotadsl.co.uk [81.6.251.123]) by smtp.nildram.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 118852BA6E2 for <gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 23:23:21 +0100 (BST) From: Peter Humphrey <prh@gotadsl.co.uk> Organization: at home To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Is equery broken, or do I need to rebuild something? Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 23:20:30 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <200704171808.43023.prh@gotadsl.co.uk> <pan.2007.04.17.18.58.15@cox.net> In-Reply-To: <pan.2007.04.17.18.58.15@cox.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-amd64+help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-amd64+unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-amd64+subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-amd64.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200704172320.30437.prh@gotadsl.co.uk> X-Archives-Salt: fb75c722-1abe-4e31-a8bf-6959edbec7c7 X-Archives-Hash: 4d80d8fe5428a892b7ee7d434eaebce9 On Tuesday 17 April 2007 19:58:18 Duncan wrote: >... you don't mention which version of gentoolkit you have merged It's gentoolkit-0.2.4_pre4, same as yours. > FWIW, portage was updated today as well: 2.1.2.4. Yes, same here. > I tried querying something else merged, no problem, tried something else > NOT merged, no problem there either. Portaudio, however, problem. > > I did a quick search of bugs, didn't find anything looking like it, so > you may wish to file one. Please reply with the bug number so I can add > my report too, plus CC and see how it's resolved. Ok, I'll take it up in the morning - too tired to think straight tonight. Thanks for your findings. -- Rgds Peter Humphrey Linux Counter 5290, Aug 93 -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list