From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HR7Gk-0005NR-To for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 13:42:27 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l2DDdE1I024182; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 13:39:14 GMT Received: from hades.rz.tu-clausthal.de (hades.rz.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.2.20]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l2DDdCV8024151 for ; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 13:39:13 GMT Received: from hades.rz.tu-clausthal.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 3FD1D205F83 for ; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 14:39:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from tu-clausthal.de (poseidon [139.174.2.21]) by hades.rz.tu-clausthal.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31C6E205F7C for ; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 14:39:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from energy.heim10.tu-clausthal.de (account wevah [139.174.241.94] verified) by tu-clausthal.de (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.7) with ESMTPSA id 21336593 for gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 14:39:12 +0100 From: "Hemmann, Volker Armin" To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Is swap need when there is 4g of ram? Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 14:39:08 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <45F66A32.1050004@singnet.com.sg> <200703131056.02337.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> <59541ff30703130546s1bc682f8w6b06e117563c96ad@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <59541ff30703130546s1bc682f8w6b06e117563c96ad@mail.gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200703131439.08752.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> X-Virus-Scanned: by PureMessage V4.7 at tu-clausthal.de X-Archives-Salt: 36835b9f-9370-456a-bb65-a671207c61ed X-Archives-Hash: 3a5e4c0d709efe8d2be130954e3a54f4 On Dienstag, 13. M=E4rz 2007, Joaquim Quinteiro Uchoa wrote: > My 50 cents: > > A swap partition is always faster than a swap file. Not so much, but is > faster.=20 nope. That was only true for 2.2 and 2.4 kernels. One of the features of 2.= 6=20 is that swapfiles are not slower anymore. -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list