From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HPgAA-0006an-Gd for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2007 14:33:43 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l29EVJdM013753; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 14:31:19 GMT Received: from platinum.cryos.net (platinum.cryos.net [195.242.214.61]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l29EVGBg013747 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 14:31:17 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by platinum.cryos.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E54312C26B for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 14:31:15 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cryos.net Received: from platinum.cryos.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (platinum.cryos.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id ctrTi9e8PZoq for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 14:31:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns0.cryos.net (ns0.cryos.net [217.155.144.221]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by platinum.cryos.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEFAE69AC for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 14:31:11 +0000 (GMT) From: "Marcus D. Hanwell" To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] WTF did I do? Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 14:31:07 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <45F1636E.9070400@ercbroadband.org> <200703091351.40089.cryos@gentoo.org> <45F16980.3070509@ercbroadband.org> In-Reply-To: <45F16980.3070509@ercbroadband.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1502816.f2KT5vP9Ym"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200703091431.11424.cryos@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: c4de0f62-fbf8-4612-b44a-bb5cf6f23983 X-Archives-Hash: 44d752b3ae394bbe0fc0ae46075e0f44 --nextPart1502816.f2KT5vP9Ym Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 09 March 2007 14:04:48 Mark Haney wrote: > Marcus D. Hanwell wrote: > > rm /etc/make.profile > > ln -s /usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/amd64/2006.1 /etc/make.profile > > > > Then all will be well again. > > Okay, now I'm confused. I've been running (and updating portage) using > that profile since Feb 21. So how is that possible? I think there was a testing version of the 2007.0 profile in the tree, it i= s=20 not there now. I have no clue how you managed to be using 2007.0 unless you= =20 made the updated link yourself. I have a system I installed two days ago which used 2006.1, it is now using= =20 2006.1/desktop, then I have several other systems I administor using 2006.0= =20 or 2006.1. Changing the symlink will fix your issue, the new profiles shoul= d=20 not be used until that version is released as they are *experimental*, i.e.= =20 things are being tried out in them etc. Right now I am busy writing up my thesis and so I am not sure exactly why t= hey=20 have been removed from the tree as I don't have time to keep up with=20 everything in the amd64 herd. I would highly recommend using 2006.1/desktop= =20 for desktop systems and making the switch to 2007.1 once the release is mad= e. --nextPart1502816.f2KT5vP9Ym Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBF8W+vzgRsaX1BF70RAqkuAJ0VLqIMSlR4fj72FdmzKQ/RBDQh9QCfdv9W gs7QDxcO3ZU2CaoIPF8bnOM= =uZQs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1502816.f2KT5vP9Ym-- -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list