From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HOtdS-0006yZ-Ou for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 10:44:43 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l27Agqe4024264; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 10:42:52 GMT Received: from email.siw.ch (email.siw.ch [217.197.213.203]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l27Agluw024247 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 10:42:51 GMT Received: from tcoulon@decoulon.ch by email.siw.ch (MDaemon PRO v9.5.6) with ESMTP id md50003635159.msg for ; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 11:42:46 +0100 From: Thierry de Coulon To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] USB scanners and udev Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 11:42:43 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 References: <200703061644.16750.prh@gotadsl.co.uk> <200703061926.30602.tcoulon@decoulon.ch> <200703070935.19104.prh@gotadsl.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <200703070935.19104.prh@gotadsl.co.uk> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200703071142.43743.tcoulon@decoulon.ch> X-Authenticated-Sender: tcoulon@decoulon.ch X-Lookup-Warning: EHLO lookup on tcoulon@decoulon.ch does not match 84.227.132.73 X-MDRemoteIP: 84.227.132.73 X-Return-Path: tcoulon@decoulon.ch X-Envelope-From: tcoulon@decoulon.ch X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org X-MDAV-Processed: email.siw.ch, Wed, 07 Mar 2007 11:42:47 +0100 X-Archives-Salt: 2f6802fe-71c6-47d7-872e-02081bf10f64 X-Archives-Hash: 303ef22e8c49c410cfa4d773a3ae7255 On Wednesday 07 March 2007 10:35, Peter Humphrey wrote: > In answer to Barry, I have this: > > $ cat /etc/udev/rules.d/92-scanner.rules > BUS=="usb", SYSFS{idVendor}=="0x4b8", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0x106", > GROUP="scanner", MODE="660" The strange thing is that I don't have any scanner.rules in my /etc/udev/, neither on Gentoo /with the Epson 1260) nor on Mepis (Ubuntu based) that uses the 640u at the moment. Maybe I'm not using udev for the scanner? I do have a libsane.rules in Mepis, in Gentoo I only have udev-early, udev, fuse and vmware rules Thierry -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list