From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GxVYD-0002nH-OD for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 21:34:06 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id kBLLV4wp005342; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 21:31:04 GMT Received: from smtpq1.groni1.gr.home.nl (smtpq1.groni1.gr.home.nl [213.51.130.200]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kBLLV1q3026226 for ; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 21:31:03 GMT Received: from [213.51.130.190] (port=37726 helo=smtp1.groni1.gr.home.nl) by smtpq1.groni1.gr.home.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1GxVXO-0004ER-Sd for gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 22:33:14 +0100 Received: from cc117081-a.gorre1.fr.home.nl ([217.120.145.240]:39516 helo=manuel.fawlty.mine.nu) by smtp1.groni1.gr.home.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1GxVFa-0008JO-66 for gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 22:14:50 +0100 From: Harm Geerts To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Amarok plugin problem Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 23:30:57 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <458971ED.80304@ercbroadband.org> <458986E0.8000602@thefreemanclan.net> <20061221062123.f400da4c.dsolaro@coffeehaus.com> In-Reply-To: <20061221062123.f400da4c.dsolaro@coffeehaus.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612212330.57690.harmgeerts@home.nl> X-AtHome-MailScanner-Information: Neem contact op met support@home.nl voor meer informatie X-AtHome-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Archives-Salt: 9efecb47-7839-4240-b42f-d806f342b0b1 X-Archives-Hash: a2d247a9c1a833ca8fc12d02aedbf28f On Thursday 21 December 2006 06:21, Denis Solaro wrote: > On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 13:54:24 -0500 > > Richard Freeman wrote: > > I've been having this problem for a while now - I've been avoiding > > Amarok as a result. Not sure what the cause is, and I haven't had much > > luck searching for the issue online. Kevin Koltzau posted the solution, if you haven't seen his mail come by you might want to look on gmane. there have been reports about lost mail on gentoo's ML's (but this may have already been fixed. I'm not sure, so if anyone can confirm that I would be thankfull) > And amarok is not your light program either. I have seen trading systems > deployed in banks that used less memory and CPU time. Yeah, but they don't play music or provide easy access to media devices or provide easy access to additional information about artists and albums or search for the lyrics of the song you listen to or integrate last.fm, which provides information about your *audioprofile* or supports dynamic playlists which selects tracks based on your criteria amarok is not light because it's not designed with that goal in mind and the ram usage is only a problem when it's needed for something else. Keep in mind, most desktop systems rarely fully utilize their resources. If ram isn't used, it's wasted. > Audacious is neat, > it's small, doesn't need a cluster of mysql databases and a Sun Enterprise > server to run. amarok also runs fine with sqlite, so this shouldn't be keeping anyone back. -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list