From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GoM2W-00069Z-Ok for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 26 Nov 2006 15:35:33 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id kAQFXhSN016139; Sun, 26 Nov 2006 15:33:43 GMT Received: from poseidon.rz.tu-clausthal.de (poseidon.rz.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.2.21]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kAQFXh9Q006092 for ; Sun, 26 Nov 2006 15:33:43 GMT Received: from poseidon.rz.tu-clausthal.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 62F66203322 for ; Sun, 26 Nov 2006 16:33:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from tu-clausthal.de (poseidon [139.174.2.21]) by poseidon.rz.tu-clausthal.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48E2C20293B for ; Sun, 26 Nov 2006 16:33:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from energy.heim10.tu-clausthal.de ([139.174.241.94] verified) by tu-clausthal.de (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.1) with ESMTPS id 18468907 for gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 26 Nov 2006 16:33:42 +0100 From: "Hemmann, Volker Armin" To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: RAM problem with X Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 16:33:41 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <200611261242.24638.mailing-gentoo@sailorferris.com> In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611261633.41825.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> X-Virus-Scanned: by PureMessage V4.7 at tu-clausthal.de X-Archives-Salt: fe7fb2e4-ba4f-421d-8051-95f7c3053461 X-Archives-Hash: bf2fd868b3bef3e2dd5b04bedd0ea4a9 On Sunday 26 November 2006 15:15, Duncan wrote: > > > So... a couple things that could help, if that is the problem.... One, > get that extension that turns flash embeds into click-links, thereby > avoiding it running unnecessarily. (I'm a Konqueror fan so don't expect > me to remember the name of the FF extension...) Two, shut down FF when > you aren't using it. > > Of course, I'd /rather/ you simply decided proprietaryware flash wasn't > worth it, but it's your computer and your decision, and not one that I'd > make for you even if I could, as what sort of freedom would I believe in > then. =8^) you can always try mplayer-bin&kmplayer to play (at least older) flash movies in konqueror. -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list