From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Gmw6B-00030v-Cl for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:41:27 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id kAMHc3vO010844; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:38:03 GMT Received: from hades.rz.tu-clausthal.de (hades.rz.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.2.20]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kAMHc2bc031063 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:38:02 GMT Received: from hades.rz.tu-clausthal.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id F02751F55AD for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 18:38:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from tu-clausthal.de (poseidon [139.174.2.21]) by hades.rz.tu-clausthal.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D60871F537B for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 18:38:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from energy.heim10.tu-clausthal.de ([139.174.241.94] verified) by tu-clausthal.de (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.1) with ESMTPS id 18386659 for gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 18:38:01 +0100 From: "Hemmann, Volker Armin" To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Another package that doesn't like GCC 4 Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 18:38:00 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <200611221628.33584.prh@gotadsl.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <200611221628.33584.prh@gotadsl.co.uk> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611221838.00926.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> X-Virus-Scanned: by PureMessage V4.7 at tu-clausthal.de X-Archives-Salt: 4ab02977-32fe-4df6-becd-3daf24f3cab8 X-Archives-Hash: d4b09d90c32d77adc442c55016d8ee35 On Wednesday 22 November 2006 17:28, Peter Humphrey wrote: which one are you talking about? because: [ebuild U ] app-crypt/gnupg-1.9.94 [1.9.22] USE="X nls -doc -gpg2-experimental -ldap -openct -pcsc-lite (-selinux) -smartcard" 3,780 kB so gnupg installed at least once with gcc4 and without ldap. And I have pretty 'experimental' Cflags. -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list