From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Glan0-0007cq-WA for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 00:44:07 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id kAJ0gHaq022810; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 00:42:17 GMT Received: from crowfix.com (crowfix.com [216.240.38.154]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kAJ0gCq2018320 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 00:42:15 GMT Received: (qmail 6812 invoked by uid 1000); 19 Nov 2006 00:42:08 -0000 Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 16:42:07 -0800 From: felix@crowfix.com To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Seamonkey vs Mozilla cage match round two Message-ID: <20061119004207.GA16779@crowfix.com> References: <20061118072026.GA12976@crowfix.com> <455EBA11.3080108@gmx.de> <20061118144602.GA28579@crowfix.com> <1163889344.9260.3.camel@laptop> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1163889344.9260.3.camel@laptop> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-Archives-Salt: 8af4e360-967e-4c5a-b291-21221b99bb42 X-Archives-Hash: 18a67d302645e93cfc10c232770dae40 On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 04:35:43PM -0600, Homer Parker wrote: > On Sat, 2006-11-18 at 06:46 -0800, felix@crowfix.com wrote: > > I use mozilla without javascript, java, etc, which probably eliminates > > most of the security problems. > > Ok, you use it like that. I bet there are people that don't though and > the mozilla team doesn't have the time/resources to fix the security > problems, and upstream has dropped support. If you want to continue to > use it with those problems, great... Dump it in your overlay and use > it.. Just remember it's unsupported and has security problems and if it > breaks you get to keep both pieces ;) I will have to stop using it someday, and I won't bother with an overlay. But last time I tried seamonkey it was unstable unreliable junk. What I want to understand is why seamonkey and mozilla can't coexist. They have different names, but even if they didn't, there are slots for apache and apache2, as many different kernels as you could possibly want, and ... mozilla and seamonkey conflict with each other. Why? -- ... _._. ._ ._. . _._. ._. ___ .__ ._. . .__. ._ .. ._. Felix Finch: scarecrow repairman & rocket surgeon / felix@crowfix.com GPG = E987 4493 C860 246C 3B1E 6477 7838 76E9 182E 8151 ITAR license #4933 I've found a solution to Fermat's Last Theorem but I see I've run out of room o -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list